He followed them, they ended up in front of the store talking to Katz. McFadden approached them, told them he was a police officer, and asked for their names. After the group gave some sort of a response, McFadden frisked terry felt a pistol, he couldn’t take it at first, so he ordered the group to go inside the store. In the store, McFadden removed the coat and then took the pistol, and patted all of them down. When Chilton was patted down, the detective also felt a gun in his coat. He did not feel a gun on Katz. Mc Fadden took all of them to the police station, yet on Terry and Chilton were charged for having concealed weapons (Saltzburg, 1998) When speaking on reasonable suspicion it appears as if McFadden in the Terry case had the ideal of what reasonable suspicion is based on. McFadden looked at the many factors, the patterns, such as them walking back and fourth at this specific store. In regardless, one can still see that he has been an officer for a long time and that may have made not only establishing credibility easier, but in distinguishing the situation as something unusual. In Terry, Chief Justice Warren repeated the rationale given that if a police officers comes across suspicious activity that can make him reasonably conclude through his experience that a crime may be in the process