Arguments Against Censorship

Words: 752
Pages: 4

Censorship has been a controversial subject for a very long time. Many people have different takes on what they think should be censored. To me censorship is something that isn’t allowed and permitted to be seen or interacted with. Censorship has a lot of different aspects to it too. It can be censored to specific ages, people, etc. In my honest opinion, there shouldn’t be censorship towards artists or their art. I think no one specifically has the right to censor something, just because they believe it should be censored. Censorship is huge in the world, but it should have its limits.
Censorship to me is when someone in a higher authority decides to censor something because it’s too sexual, violent, or simply controversial. As said by Thomas Jefferson "I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as a cause for withdrawing from a friend." He basically explains that people can have their difference in opinions, nothing will ever change that, but just because of that matter, it doesn’t necessarily mean that we can censor everything. “Censorship is like poison gas: a powerful weapon that can harm you when the wind shifts.” This quote from Freedom of
…show more content…
Things that only cause emotional problems, should stay uncensored. If you don’t like something stay away from it as said in my previous paragraph. I think when censorship should be implicated is when it actually starts causing huge problems that will affect lots of people, or when it results to physical implications. When something reaches that level, that is when something, in my opinion, should be censored. That is the only way or the only situation where I believe that something should be censored. If something is not causing huge problems affecting a large amount of people, such as actual violence or something along the lines of that, it should stay