Battle At The Plains Of Abraham Analysis

Words: 1613
Pages: 7
Open Document
The Battle at the Plains of Abraham between the British James Wolfe, and the French Louis-Joseph de Montcalm, was a pivotal moment in determining the future of Canada. As it was a turning point in the Seven Years’ War, the key players are frequently scrutinized by historians seeking to understand the after-effects and consequences of their actions. Despite his victory, Wolfe is still highly criticized for his ‘risky’ and ‘careless’ actions, arguably owing his victory to sheer luck. Alternatively, Montcalm is critiqued for his tactical errors during the battle, and his distraction by feuds with New France’s governor, Vaudreuil. There are numerous factors that need to be taken into consideration when evaluating what led to the outcome of the …show more content…
New France’s security was consequentially placed in jeopardy – being open to attack on new fronts; both up and down the St. Lawrence River where Louisbourg and Oswego previously offered protection, as well as from the British colonies to the south. New France was in a much more vulnerable position, encircled by British forces, and France’s inability to guarantee backup support heightened the fears of the British capturing the colony. Many sources note that Montcalm himself believed his colony would inevitably be defeated because of France’s failure to provide support. Additionally, the absent support caused many New French to feel abandoned and consequently, to no longer feel bound by honour to defend their colony on behalf of their mother country. The supply shortage caused Montcalm to rely on a variety of troops – both regular forces as well as Canadien and aboriginal militia. The militia were men residing in the colonies (both Canadien and aboriginal) who were physically able to fight – although often they had poor or no training at all for combat. Unlike the British force, Montcalm’s army was less trained and inefficient when it came to battle, and military tactics were not effectively implemented to the same extent as the …show more content…
However, Montcalm had made any progress extremely difficult. He fortified the riverbanks closely, allowing his troops to move quickly between locations [how do fortifications speed people up?], and making it difficult for the British to attack unnoticed. Wolfe resorted to a new campaign, ‘Skirmishing Cruelty and Devastation.’ In this, the British bombarded the city and ransacked several surrounding colonies in an attempt to draw Montcalm out for battle. Wolfe’s actions in New France in the months leading up to the Plains of Abraham demonstrate the tenacity and strength of his troops. Several actions were undertaken to cut off supplies to the French, such as blocking roadways into Quebec and capturing Niagara – both which halted the resource flow from the west. It was clear that the British were progressively encircling the French, which leads some to question whether it was only a matter of time before the French surrendered. Several historians argue that even if Wolfe had been defeated in this battle, New France would not have remained under French control. Wolfe’s superior, General Jeffrey Amherst, had been planning a larger force to attack Montreal the following year, and it is likely that he would have had the resources and power to defeat Montcalm. Eventual British conquest of Quebec was likely, but the outcome at the Plains of Abraham was contingent on the actions of both Wolfe and
Show More

Related Documents: Battle At The Plains Of Abraham Analysis

Questions On Pericles Funeral Oration

GUIDE 2 * REMEMBER TO BRING A BLUEBOOK TO THE EXAM Pericles’ Funeral Oration(Pericles of Athens) The Epitaphios (Funeral Oration)- Athenian FUNERAL SPEECH (importance of oration), Unique Athenian custom, waited to bury fallen soldiers until after battle year, not buried on field but in Athens cemetery, buried by TRIBE Pericles of Athens- Leading statesmen at Athens height of power- oversaw construction of the Parthenon Declaration of the Rights of Man (John Locke) The French Revolution- Reaction…

Words 2166 - Pages 9

United States and Essential Questions Essay

frame class discussions; these are often used as writing assignments. Assessment of essays are measured by the following: the degree to which they fully and directly answer the question, the strength of thesis statement, level and effectiveness of analysis, amount and quality of supporting evidence, and organizational quality. In addition to these standards, DBQs are graded on the basis of the degree to which a significant number of the documents have been used to support the thesis, and the amount…

Words 7288 - Pages 30

DDO Branding Essay

surnames first names groups Dell, Ford, McDonald’s Aldus, Ben & Jerry’s Quaker Oats, Roman Meal specific spot city or town region country continent larger still Parliament, Wall Street Journal Calistoga, Corning Eastern, Great Plains British Airways North American Van Lines Global, World, Universal static identity systems with fixed rules Target United Airlines kinetic identity systems 3 with rules allowing variation MTV MIT Media Lab words most brand names…

Words 2368 - Pages 10

1105333226 2004 English Advanced Notes Hussain Essay

Speeches Abraham Lincoln: Government of the people, by the people, for the people’ 1863 Also known as the ‘Gettysburg Address’, this concise speech is simple in its language yet carries a complex message of freedom for all men including the abolition of Negroes in slavery during the period of the Civil War in America. Given at Gettysburg after a great battle and victory for the North, Lincoln praises the efforts of the dead and also calls upon the living to continue fighting for the cause of…

Words 7927 - Pages 32