Originating as a university subject in the late nineteenth century, British imperial history has been a patriotic mission narrating a tale of indomitable march of the values of Enlightenment and modernity that helped salvage the subject populations in the colonies from centuries of ignorance and backwardness. In other words, it was an ideological defence of British expansion where the histories of the colonies were hardly accounted for. This celebratory tone, however tended to wane in the post-1950s as the process of decolonisation set in.1 Focus now tended to shift away from Britain to the role of indigenous people on the spot in the making and unmaking of the British empire.2 The 1960s and 1970s were predominated by national histories with a strong focus on anti-colonial struggles. In such a context, …show more content…
One of the most prominent examples is the multi-volumed Oxford History of the British Empire. Ranging from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries, it addresses the rise of the British empire and its demise, and aims at a comprehensive account of imperial politics, ideologies, and economics, and their impact on the people it ruled. An important feature of this series is an understanding of the division between the 'first' British empire, centred on the settlements in America and the West Indies, the slave trade, and the domination of Ireland, and the Anglo-Scottish Union of 1707 on the one hand, and the 'second' British empire comprising British possessions in Asia, Africa, Australia and the Pacific on the other with the end of the Seven Years' War in 1763 as the watershed.4 The series however, falls short in its aim at providing for the non-western populations' perspective of the British empire. The indigenous people have been largely viewed through the prism of imperial power and