The sequential justice model combines aspects of both models; the criminal court model occurs up to the sentencing, because the …show more content…
Both sides have compelling arguments, but although I support the offender based consideration, I believe the criminal justice model should be imposed because the principle of government rests on equality before the law, and deeper inconsistencies of this fact are found in the juvenile justice model. In regard of varying sentences for (essentially) the same crime and two separate procedures for adolescents and adults; which can deny all the rights of due process, the juvenile system rests too heavily on opinion rather than fact. The brutal reality is the US legal system cannot possibly account for everyone, in the ideal world both models would produce uniform sentences, and rehabilitation would be successful in all situations. But America is too big and diverse to make judgments solely based on everyone’s personal state, and in some cases this principle eliminates the operation of legal law- to be independent from informal law that is based on the collective consciousness of societies to