High Noon Analysis

Words: 1020
Pages: 5

When you hear the word "hunting", what do you think of? A man hunting an animal, right? Well in " The Most Dangerous Game" and "High Noon" hunting has a different meaning. In these stories a man is hunting another man. Crazy right? Well, in "The Most Dangerous Game" Rainsford falls off his boat and ends up on an island. Being washed out by sea to a deserted island is bad enough, but being hunted while on that island is even worse. Rainsford was being hunted, like an animal, by General Zaroff and had to survive to wins Zaroff's little game. He has to survive or else General Zaroff would kill Rainsford. That's kind of what happened to Will Kane, too. He was getting "hunted" by Frank Miller because he wanted revenge from Kane. He wanted to kill …show more content…
In "High Noon" Henderson said, "Will, I think you ought to go while there's still time. It's better for you -- and better for us" (Foreman 315). One of the people in the church was lecturing about how they should have helped, but didn't because they wanted to save themselves and their families. In this story, the theme was saying that your so-called "friends" could abandon you at any minute because people are selfish. In " The Most Dangerous Game", there is a different message. Zaroff said, "Hunting tigers ceased to interest me some years ago. I exhausted their possibilities, you see. No thrill left in Tigers, no real danger. I live for danger, Mr. Rainsford" (Connell 218). Zaroff was hunting for so long, that he has hunted everything known to man kind. He has become tired of the average game, and wants the ultimate game: humans. He noticed that hunting the perfect "game" was too boring, too perfect. He also has the best of the best things in his chateau. He has the best wine, clothes, and food, which is very expensive, by the way. In a way, his life seemed to be perfect, but to Zaroff, perfection is boring, and money can't just buy you happiness, even though some people think