How Does Globalization Maintain Racialized Space?

Words: 2013
Pages: 9

To many people globalization was seen as the beginning of the end for racism as many were being exposed to thousands of other cultures from around the world and has the ability to instantly communicate with others from around the world causing the significance of racialized space to fall. Yet globalization seemed to have the opposite effect, instead of uniting and opening the minds of people it seemed to divide and close the off even more. This seemed to be because many people of privilege refused to risk losing it and so they began to make claims of privilege to local spaces in order to keep racialized space alive in their own way. As they did this others soon began to follow for their own reasons, but in the end it was always related to …show more content…
In fact the shirking significance of space and time as Barlow said is another reason many privileged people have begun to put an emphasis on local space. This is because many of those privileged people in the States have lived in a racialized space where they were usually in control in some way, shape, or form. In fact throughout American history we see how space was used in order to promote racism and segregation as those minorities or less privileges where forced to live in certain locations and forbidden from loving in others essentially separating them from those who were superior in their view. We see this in the form of Indian reservations, Jim Crow laws, and even the suburbs when they were first made. In order to clarify just how valuable the use of racialized space was many of the people tended to live in the same city, but due to the separation space one side was usually much more wealthy or safe than another one as the one where those with privilege lived had more funding than the other location where the minority lived. This is why many people know are putting so much more emphasize and premium on “local” as it allows them to retain this control over space …show more content…
This was due to the fact that globalization helped increase the amount of inequality amongst many nation-states or third world countries by destroying their structure and economies through colonialism. This has then caused terrorist to attack the nations that did this as retribution like the United States, and the misguided response by the nation’s only led to more issues. For example the U.S’ response was to invade an innocent nation, denounce a culture, and end up publicly denouncing a race and religion that simply played a small role in the attacks. That along with the rise of xenophobia around the world populace is a bad mix as a country was saying that a specific group of people were evil beings and as such deserved punishment which sadly ended up pushing many people to promote an anti-Arab and Muslim view amongst many western nations. Basically a terrorist attack that was a result of globalization ended up promoting racial intolerance and hate for a group of people because the attackers where from said group. Along with it the response also had the consequence of increasing xenophobic fear of many other races as long as one could spin a view that they were a threat to our home. In fact many Americans would “now openly advocate anti-immigration policies that before September 11, 2001, were considered extremist” (Barlow: