She starts off her article by discussing girls’ lacrosse how the rules are dramatically different from boys’ games. She states, “In addition, despite the less-aggressive nature and rules of the girls' game, girls' lacrosse has an in-game concussion rate only 15 percent lower than the boys.” Girl lacrosse players only have to wear protective googles, but if the head injury rate is almost high as boys then why do they not wear helmets? Wallace said there needs to be safer changes to these games, so no one can hurt for life. She says in order to to improve the safety the athletes playing these sports must know the high-risk behaviors that can cause serious injuries. During her article she mentions John Adams, a British researcher, who says safety equipment will not reduce the safety. Wallace mentions that Adams mentions “risk compensation” which is when “humans respond to additional safety equipment by taking greater risks than they did when they felt less protected” (Wallace). He says, “while seat belts unquestionably gave a person better protection if they were in a collision, the chances of being in a collision went up in places with seat belt laws, because seat-belted drivers took more risks in how they drove.” Which means people think since they have their seat belt on they can do more risky things when they are driving