Jacksonian Democracy DBQ

Words: 693
Pages: 3

In light of the following documents and your knowledge of the 1820’s and 1830’s, to what extent do you agree with the Jacksonians’ view of themselves? The self-thought benevolence of the Jacksonian democrats was clearly very delusional. Although they called themselves the guardians of the Constitution, democracy, liberty, and equality, the events that occurred under their prevalence and Jackson’s presidency contradicted their beheld values. The Jacksonians; view of themselves was very warped with idealism, and. despite the fact that those ideals could have been a foundation of the party to begin with, they did not exist throughout the time period. Jackson was a very well-liked president of his time. As a war hero and veteran of the War of 1812, many reverently followed both him and his beliefs as president. However, that did not necessarily mean that all US citizens were his supporters. Daniel Webster was one of …show more content…
Jackson’s veto message sounds reasonable from a political standpoint appealing to the common man, where the rich have too much power and influence compared to the poor. Evans’ “The Working Man’s Declaration of Independence” spells out the need for a party like the Jacksonians to sustain the American values that were promised to the people in the constitution. Both documents were heavily biased because of their authors and their intentions to persuade people to side with the democratic party’s creation and upholdings.
(Docs A, B) The Jacksonians were very hypocritical in how they did not practice what they preached. Their supposed values of guarding the constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity were either poorly demonstrated or completely