John C Calhoun Analysis

Words: 891
Pages: 4
Open Document
The United States was undergoing an unstable time period during the nineteenth century, putting the nation in a delicate state. During the Second Party System, Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun, and Henry Clay were crucial keys in the political movement to retain the Union. The Great Triumvirate, Webster, Calhoun, and Clay, each favored their own region of the United States and acted upon their prejudice as politicians. Nevertheless, these statesmen are famously known for preserving the Union through compromises, debates, and doctrines. Daniel Webster was a talented orator from Massachusetts. He belonged to the short-lived Whig political party, which was formed in opposition to Andrew Jackson’s policies. In many circumstances, Webster endorsed …show more content…
Calhoun from South Carolina was notably different from Daniel Webster. Calhoun was a democrat who eventually became the seventh vice president of the United States. Like Webster, John C. Calhoun favored his section of the country, and his actions reflected his favoritism. Calhoun was an outspoken supporter of the War of 1812, also referred to as “War Hawk”. Calhoun was indignant towards the British for violating maritime rights by imprisoning Americans and wanted the British reprimanded, regardless of the adverse effect it would have on the North. One of John C. Calhoun’s most troubling aspects was his growing support of slavery, a commonly held opinion in the South. What makes John C. Calhoun a nationalist was his disapproval of secession during the Nullification Crisis. The Nullification Crisis was the time period when South Carolina threatened secession due to the Tariff of 1828, which Calhoun opposed. This tariff, nicknamed the “Tariff of Abominations”, increased duty on imported goods, benefitting the North but injuring the South, which believed that the tariff was unconstitutional. John C. Calhoun, hoping to maintain the Union, counseled restraint, offering the Doctrine of Nullification instead. Calhoun argued that the Federal government existed at the will of the states. Once the crisis was avoided, Calhoun attended a banquet with Andrew Jackson, and replied to Jackson’s toast with “Our Union- it must be preserved. The Union- …show more content…
Calhoun, and Henry Clay. Webster and Calhoun eased tensions during the Nullification Crisis, Webster had an approach that favored the North while Calhoun’s strongly supported the South. Lastly, but equally notable, was Clay’s Compromise of 1850 which appeased both the North and the South which in turn forestalled the American Civil War. Each of these skilled politicians set aside their loyalties to their respective sections of the nation in order to protect the
Show More

Related Documents: John C Calhoun Analysis

John C Calhoun Slavery Analysis

John C Calhoun was an american statesman and political theorist from South Carolina. His role as a statesman was to define clearly the alternatives and or future before them. He intended to change the political dynamic in regard to abolitionism. The overall main point Calhoun was trying to get across was that slavery was a positive good for blacks. A side point in his speech was that abolitionism was not going to go away unless called to account by vigorous rejection it would grow. Calhoun begins…

Words 528 - Pages 3

Rhetorical Analysis Of John C Calhoun Slavery For A Positive Good

John C. Calhoun’s “Slavery for a Positive Good” manifests all of Mr. Calhoun's views on slavery in a tangible form. In his address it quickly becomes evident that he and his approval of slavery will stand firm and unwavering. However his efforts to justify such an atrocity signify the matter’s importance. In other words, Calhoun understands that slavery is a Critical Crossroad. Subsequently he goes to great lengths to defend his ideal and what he believes and holds to be truth. He understands that…

Words 634 - Pages 3

Essay on The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It

Great American Political Thinkers In the year of 1776, the United States became an independent country. At that moment, the great men who fought for its independence began to create the government and shape American politics. In Richard Hofstadter's The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It, he identifies twelve of the most influential men and the political traditions they created, including the Founding Fathers who started it all. Additionally, Hofstadter informs the reader of other…

Words 7046 - Pages 29

Love: Communication and Transmission View Essay

CHAPTER 1 A Cultural Approach to Communication James Carey (from Communication as Culture) When I decided some years ago to read seriously the literature of communications, a wise man suggested I begin with John Dewey. It was advice I have never regretted accepting. Although there are limitations to Dewey–his literary style was described by William James as damnable–there is a depth to his work, a natural excess common to seminal minds, that offers permanent complexities, and paradoxes over which…

Words 8149 - Pages 33

course notes Essay

Sociology Semester 2 2011 Sociology 100 – Issues and Themes in Sociology University of Auckland Semester 2 2011 Sociology Semester 2 2011 Sociology 100 – Issues and Themes in Sociology • • The sociological perspective/way of seeing society has been described by Bauman as “the habit of viewing human actions as elements of wider figurations: that is of a non-random assembly of actors locked together in a web of mutual dependency.” (pg. 7 of ‘Being Sociological’) According to Peter…

Words 8678 - Pages 35