Machiavelli's Argument Analysis

Words: 1101
Pages: 5
Open Document
Aristotle was also an ancient Greek philosopher, was born in 384 B.C. He was a student in Plato’s Academy and was a tutor for Alexander the Great. He eventually moved on to create his own school in Athens, where he wrote about many different topics including politics, ethics and poetry, etc. Aristotle wrote Politics as a tool to explain political communities of the time, where they fell short and what to improve on. Aristotle wanted to explain in his book, Politics, that there were six forms of government, and he identifies each of these governments as being either true or defective. (Lorde 2013, 74). Aristotle believed that governments that have a regard for the principles of justice and common interest are true forms and those whose rule …show more content…
Aristotle would not have agreed with the notion that it is better to be feared than loved because his objective was to protect the common good. On the other hand, Machiavelli’s aim was to protect the ruler and the power of governing. They do both agree that when ruling it is best to leave their people to their own devices, Aristotle thinking it is better for the governed and Machiavelli thinking it would be beneficial to power. (Lorde 2013, …show more content…
They both do agree however, that it is essential, but differ when discussing the context. Plato in, The Republic believes that in the state of nature people are inherently good but Hobbes would argue that people do what it takes to best protect themselves. Hobbes in Leviathan suggests that “through vanity, or comparison, or appetite” humans will be provoked into aggression (Gaskin, J. C. 2008, 64). In The Republic and Leviathan there is some type of government, they both recognized that having a hierarchy would potentially stop society from collapsing. Plato believes that having a higher class to guide citizens to act morally would benefit a society, being the justice and law within the
Show More

Related Documents: Machiavelli's Argument Analysis

“What is important about any philosophy is not what is explains, but what it assumes” Essay

both Machiavallian and Plantonic philosophies make assumptions in exemplifying their notions. Machiavelli’s is intentional while Plato’s is unintentional. Also both philosophies through their assumptions sometimes contradict each other. Well expressed In discussing his notion above it is important to understand the basic theory and ideas of Machiavelli and Plato. Both Machiavelli and Plato produce arguments for order in the state but they have different notions of how to go about order. Plato obsesses…

Words 1036 - Pages 5

Essay on Ir Theory Article Review-Doyle

first IR theorists in modern era to analyze the assumptions on liberal peace focusing mainly on Kant’s idea. The John Hopkins University published this article in 1986. In this paper I will summarize the article and give analysis on key points that drive the main arguments in…

Words 1083 - Pages 5

Absolute Monarchy Dbq

During the 16th and 17th centuries, there were various political views regarding the most effective way of governing in Europe. An analysis of the documents clearly shows that at the time, two major political views emerged in Europe. Supporters of an absolute monarchy believed handing all governing power to one individual was best because the rulers could legally be strict and harsh, complementing some belief that humans are inherently evil and need to be set in their place through strict rule. Others…

Words 1258 - Pages 6