Rhetoric and Argument Essay

Words: 1336
Pages: 6
Open Document
ENG122: Composition II
An Introduction to Argument

English 122: Composition II
An Introduction to Argument
Argument and Rhetoric
An argument can take many forms. It is, at its root, a method for communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are essential elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms.
1. Claim
2. Evidence
3. Counterargument
4. Rebuttal
A successful argument depends upon the delicate balance between these elements. Imagine a teeter-totter at the playground. The claim is the basis of the argument, much like the base of the teeter-totter. A big opposing viewpoint, called the counterargument, is constantly pushing down on one side or the other. Balance can only be …show more content…
Common ground is the shared values, concerns, and constraints of each party. There are no clear winners or losers in this type of argument style. The key is that both (or various) parties profit in some defined fashion while making concessions or changes that benefit the traditionally labeled opposition. The structure below is a basic outline of how a consensual (common ground) argument is constructed. The sections do not represent paragraphs; they represent distinct segments of an argumentative essay and, with the exception of the introduction and thesis statement, the body of an essay can be situated in any fashion that is most effective at convincing a given audience.
Section One: Introduction and Thesis—Your introduction should describe the rhetorical situation and give the audience a clear forecast of the material you will cover in your essay.
Your thesis statement should make a clear, limited, descriptive assertion and explain why your stance matters. However, you need to remember to argue for a solution that is acceptable to both perspectives. Your thesis should clearly state a type of compromise. You should then be able to expand on that compromise in Section Three. Example: Though video games often have positive educational value, children should not be allowed to play video games until they are 13 years old.
Section Two: Present the perspective that you disagree with the most. Make sure you
Show More

Related Documents: Rhetoric and Argument Essay

Toulmin's Rhetoric: The Layout Of Argument

his work On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic with the history of rhetoric and its place in society, but he also discusses questions brought up by others regarding its use both practically and otherwise. Particularly, he brings up the notion discussed previously by Aristotle that, if truth can be expressed and understood and if men are what they seem—that being expressing only truth—what is the necessity for rhetoric? However, Scott debates this point by using “The Layout of Argument” chapter in one of…

Words 266 - Pages 2

Essay on Rhetoric and Argument

Academic Argument When writing a paper an argument is usually needed to form a debate for your paper. An argument can be used to make a paper stronger or try to persuade readers to see things from your point of view. Also, an argument or claim must begin with a thesis or claim. When forming a claim or thesis you need to know when it is debatable or un-debatable. Typically, topics that are usually agreed upon are un-debatable. A thesis needs to be to the point but be supported by evidence. To make…

Words 373 - Pages 2

Essay on Plato’s argument about the value and nature of rhetoric

RHET 120 Goss Essay Plato’s argument about the value and nature of rhetoric AcerA2 102013 2/14/2014 Similar to the other ancient philosophers, Plato remains a virtue based eudemonistic thought of ethics. As many defined that Rhetoric is the art of discourse. It is believed to be the important element to keep writer or speaker to reach the purpose of inform, persuade, and motivate with particular audience. In addition, rhetoric has played a crucial role in the Western tradition in the…

Words 846 - Pages 4

Rhetoric In Jay Heinrichs 'Thank You For Arguing'

readers to the art of rhetoric. He explains how to argue, syncrisis, and argumentum ad fortiori. When arguing, people should use the future tense, as it is “the most productive.” Future tense is best because it offers both choices and decisions. Syncrisis is the next major component to understanding rhetoric. Syncrisis is defined as: “a figure that reframes an argument by redefining it.” Syncrisis is vital to some form of rhetoric because it allows you to alter the way an argument is going. By saying…

Words 1225 - Pages 5

phl320 r2 critical thinking ch05 Essay

Chapter 5 PERSUASION THROUGH RHETORIC © 2012 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All righ ts reserved. So far we’ve examined: Two kinds of argument:  Those trying to prove or demonstrate a conclusion  Those trying to support a conclusion © 2012 McGraw-Hill Higher Educati 2 Arguments that try to DEMONSTRATE a conclusion include arguments like these:  All As are Bs. No Bs are Cs. No As are Cs.  If P then Q. Not-Q. Not-P. © 2012 McGraw-Hill Higher Educati 3 Arguments that try to SUPPORT a conclusion…

Words 934 - Pages 4

Rhetoric Reflective Essay

Whether students know so or not, rhetoric plays an important role in every essay. Rhetoric is how we find and employ the most effective means of persuasion, how we construct careful arguments, and how our writing remains clear and to the point. Rhetoric is indisputably important, yet, I was unaware of the importance of rhetoric until I recently received a poor grade on an essay for my 400-level English course. To make matters worse, my professor made sure to comment on my weak thesis and lack of…

Words 1030 - Pages 5

Analysis Of Nathan Crick's 'When We Can' T Wait On Truth

In "When We Can't Wait On Truth: The Nature of Rhetoric in The Rhetoric of Science", Nathan Crick analyzes the presence of rhetoric in the realm of modern science as well as historical science to his audience. Crick begins his analysis through an examination of Alan Gross' initial writings on the subject of rhetoric in science from 1996, in which gross attributes the growth of knowledge to persuading yourself of a discovered fact and then persuading others of that same fact that was discovered. However…

Words 251 - Pages 2

Who Is Jay Heinrichs Thank You For Arguing

the book to show how the art of rhetoric can help people in different aspects of life and how rhetoric can improve one’s life because argument is everywhere nowadays. Heinrichs introduces plans, strategies, and tips throughout the book for arguing such as when arguing you could say “ ‘I’m not here to make personal attacks...I just want to...’ then name the opposite of your opponent’s weakness”(121). In the book Heinrichs discusses both modern and classical rhetoric and references to real life examples…

Words 619 - Pages 3

Socrates Rhetorical Analysis

Socrates and Medea abuse rhetoric in an effort to manipulate the way others view them, and create an image that will help them gain control over the situations they are in. Socrates uses rhetoric by controlling the image of his accusers, and in the self portrait he creates for his audience. He presents himself as a man of good character, someone who should be trusted more so than those who are accusing him. His ability to do this is supported by his self confidence, which serves as the foundation…

Words 1328 - Pages 6

Summary Of Free Speech In Wartime

the American’s merchant ships. The events taken place in this period explains the author’s strong use of persuasive rhetoric, argumentative tone and diction against the entry of the United Stated in World War I. Senator Robert M. La Follette Sr.’s main purpose in his speech was to defend his right and the American’s people…

Words 607 - Pages 3