Samuel Adams Dbq

Words: 633
Pages: 3

Some say interpretation is the basis of any argument. The colonists based their protests on their interpretation of the British Constitution and on the higher authority that came in the form of natural laws and natural rights. This is reflected by Samuel Adams, James Otis, and John Hancock, because they all interpreted the constitution in order to advocate for their causes. If laws clashed with their own beliefs they worked adamantly to make themselves heard. Whether they disagreed with one or all British policies, it was a common goal to uphold the rights of the people.
Samuel Adams was America’s foremost agitator in that he lead the charge for colonial resistance to parliamentary policies. By protesting diligently against British policies, he aided in colonies gaining independence. He was an avid protester of tax acts such as the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act. As passionate leader of this cause, he inspired patriots in Massachusetts to hang stamp officials and destroy the home of
…show more content…
He was an early advocate of Patriot views against British policy leading to the American Revolution. His first act of resistance was a five hour argument against the renewal of the writs of assistance. It was his vehement belief that these writs were unconstitutional, because they gave access to search someone’s home without probable cause. Though he lost the case, few officials dared to employ the orders in the future in fear of angering the public. In addition, while attending the “Stamp Act Congress” James was able to unify protests against new British taxation by issuing a Declaration of Rights and Grievances. His ability to see things from a conservative point of view- due to his past conservative career- allowed him to rally more colonial opposition against British policy. All in all, Otis’ integrity in his cause lead to his success and immense