Samurai Knights Dbq

Words: 458
Pages: 2
Open Document
Samurai and Knights take a long trip to 1000 to 1600 CE. Both Knights and Samurai took victory in wars. If Knights, and Samurai engaged in Battle, who would triumph? In my opinion, I think samurai’s would win in war. These soldiers developed in Japan and Europe because there conditions led to the need of protection ; “The Imperial court was challenged by the rise of the clans.” (Source 1). So Who would triumph, a knight, or a samurai? I would think samurais would triumph because they have more knowledge than knights. They trained younger than knights, literally. “A boy in a Samurai family was given his first sword when he was born. It was not a real sword, but a symbol of the life he was going to lead.” (Source 4) Samurais started to train …show more content…
It could be as strong as steel, hard as a rock. Although knights had some of the same things, Samurais were layered for war, ready to fight. The face guard protects the samurai by its 8 to 12 iron plates. Although knights had armor as well and were more protected, Samurais had throat guards. This protected the throat by being slashed deadly. “Similar pieces of lacquered metal formed waist plates that hung from the breastplate rested below the helmet,” This is how the lower body is protected. “This created a ‘Shell’ that provided both mobility and protection.” (Source 3) Armor did help, but what about the weapons? The weapons samurais used were bows and arrows, the sword, and the spear. The bows had an advantage because the bow was bigger and taller than the person himself. The long sword, Katana, was the samurais most special possession. People describe it as “the soul of the samurai.” It was a long, curved sword that can cut through a brick of ice. It was also a single edged blade so you could have a long handle grip, sometimes used with two hands for extra power. For more protection, the samurai carried an extra short sword called a Wakizashi. It was only often used to deliver the straw of breath that an enemy has. Samurais have disadvantages, but have a lot more advantages. Samurais are loyal, confident, and engaged in a war if needed to. They protect any other people. I Would think Samurais would triumph in a
Show More

Related Documents: Samurai Knights Dbq

Dbq Summary: Samurai Vs. Knights

Samurai vs. Knights DBQ By Alex Kramer Imagine you are a squire and you have seven years of training still to do until you're a knight. In those years you fight with your master dress and feed him and care for his horses. Now imagine you are a young boy and you have about 10 more years of training. In those years you study Kendo. Samurais and Knights did this in the year 1000.The similarities of samurais and knights are less than the differences because of their code of honor, their armor, and…

Words 371 - Pages 2

Knights Vs Samurai Dbq Essay

If knights and samurai ever fought, who do you think would win? While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in armor, training, and a code of honor. The first way that samurais have an advantage is armor. In document D written in the packet it says that the samurai armor was tough and was made of iron scales tied with silk or leather. This means that samurai could take more hits or shots because it could withstand…

Words 490 - Pages 2

Knights Vs Samurai Dbq Essay

probably think of US army men with an assortment of camouflage clothing on. However, during the Middle Ages it's pretty obvious that they don’t have camouflage resources (OI). Samurai and knights are the two main types of warriors in the japanese and european countries (Doc. C). To conclude, the differences between the knights and samurai are almost the same as the similarities but a little higher. One of the high differences is the feudal charts. The purpose of the feudal charts was to show the order…

Words 511 - Pages 3