Should National Government Be More Powerful State Government

Words: 667
Pages: 3
Open Document
National Government Should Be More Powerful Than State Government

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter” -Winston Churchill
While the founding fathers may have intended for a more powerful state government, the states have demonstrated time and time again that a national government is more efficient at dealing with the issues that plague the nation. A stronger National government is especially necessary when it comes to the regulation of interstate commerce, civil rights, and the management of currency.

“Anarchism is founded on the observation that since few men are wise enough to rule themselves, even fewer are wise enough to rule others.” – Edward Abbey One of the biggest flaws in running a stronger State government is the fragmentation of power that would result. Every state would have the freedom to create and enforce the laws that they designed, much to the detriment of transporting information or commerce. The supreme court sided with the national government in the court case Gibbons vs. Ogden (1824), stating that the national government had the power to regulate interstate commerce, according to the commerce clause in Article 1, section 8 of the constitution. Giving …show more content…
While minority rights are respected in the constitution, the civil rights movement goes to show that the tyranny of the majority still exists .Allowing the states the power to decide over civil rights would inevitably lead to a decision that encroached upon (or downright dismissed) minority rights. In the case of Margaret Sanger, other rights can also be affected by state’s interpretation of the constitution, that are more easily protected by the strength of the national government. A national government that is prone to favor minority rights over the tyranny of the majority is a healthier, stronger, and better
Show More

Related Documents: Should National Government Be More Powerful State Government

Federalist: United States and Strong Central Government Essay

competing basic political philosophies have always existed throughout the United States’ history; one seeking to increase the power of the central government, and one seeking to decrease it. During the 1800s, the two philosophies were played out by the Federalist and the Republican parties conflicting in many different ways. The Federalists, represented by Alexander Hamilton, promoted the importance of a strong central government to succeed in the world, while the Republicans, represented by Thomas Jefferson…

Words 878 - Pages 4

Compare And Contrast Democrats And Federalists

history of disagreeing, it went back all the way when George Washington was president. These two people are the people who started the political parties. The Federalists are led by Alexander hamilton and John Adams. The Federalists believed that we should be allies with Great Britain. One of the big reasons they liked Great Britain is because they have good trade ties with them. The Republicans are led by Tomas Jefferson. The Republicans want the French to be America’s allies. Jefferson wanted the…

Words 596 - Pages 3

Us Honors Notes Essay

Freedom- statue stating in part that the human mind was created free and that government control over religious beliefs or worship is tyrannical 3. Articles of Confederation- document that created an association of states while guaranteeing each state its “Sovereignty, freedom, and independence” 4. Daniel Shays- a former Revolutionary War captain, along with other angry farmers, took up arms against the government due to “taxation without representation” 5. James Madison- of Virginia, served…

Words 752 - Pages 4

Difference Between Jefferson And Hamilton

conflicted a loose or strict conduct of the united states constitution was the issue on national bank. The Loose Constitutional interpretation that Alexander Hamilton argued for a much more powerful federal government and a much broader reading of the Necessary and Proper Clause. Hamilton unlike Jefferson wanted to use the federal government to pursue an aggressive strategy of industrialization and economic development. Hamilton's vision called for the government to organize banks, build roads, and invest…

Words 321 - Pages 2

American History - title Essay

With the creation of the American constitution of 1787 came the establishment of a system in which the government and the private sector grew hand in hand towards nothing none other than elitism. To say that such a constitution is “just” would require one to be blind to the truth; naturally an elitist system could only be just to those who benefit from it, in this case those within the government as well as those in the realm of wealth. In depth, it is because of the creditor class of the time that…

Words 1857 - Pages 8

Politicle parties to split Essay

secretary of State , did not agree on anything at all. These opposing viewpoints led to the rising of the first political parties, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The key difference to Hamilton and Jeffersons views was how much power , size and scope each side thought that the federal government should have over the individual states.Hamilton believed that the country should be ruled by the wealthy class. He believed in a strong federal government , leaving…

Words 1057 - Pages 5

Summary Of Thomas Jefferson's Inaugural Address

ideas was necessary to reflect public good. In the second paragraph he states, “Let us, then, fellow citizens, unite with one heart and one mind. Let us restore to social intercourse that harmony and affection without which liberty and even life itself are but dreary things.”, Jefferson is conveying that people should come together as one, despite party boundaries, and that the losing party should still participate in government. This solidified the first peaceful transition of power since the election…

Words 418 - Pages 2

Federalism Research Paper

role in our government since the time that the Constitution was ratified. It originally gave the majority of the power to the states. As time went on, the national government gained more and more power. It used the "necessary and proper" clause of the Constitution to validate its acts, and the Supreme Court made decisions that strengthened the national government creating a more unified United States. Finally, the recent course of federalism has been to give powers back to the states. Federalism…

Words 1718 - Pages 7

Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

so-called “government,” which has more similar characteristics to a confederation, there is no option other than the ratification of the Constitution. The Confederation is a pathetic excuse for a nation, as there are no efforts being put forth for the greater good. We must fight for a stronger government to protect the freedom we fought for, and if not, then what is the point of our newfound freedom? In “Federalist 1,” Hamilton states that “it will be equally forgotten that the vigor of government is essential…

Words 632 - Pages 3

Thomas Jefferson's Rhetorical Analysis

describe the Republicans would be they didn’t like a strong government and that the people could run themselves. They believed in no national banks, that states should have more power. In Jefferson’s opinion of national banks, he stated that they are unconstitutional. He states two main points “They are not among the powers specially enumerated” and “Nor are they within either of the general phrases”. Under the first supporting point, he states that it is there to be able to pay a debt with taxes, but…

Words 1024 - Pages 5