Anderson first introduces Caracas as a beautiful city that contradicts his view of Hugo Chavez as a failed ruler, until he reveals that the image of the old city has actually been long gone since Chavez came into power. In the 1950’s, Venezuela overthrew its military dictator Marcos Perez Jimenez just after his six years in office, but Jimenez left behind a great deal of public works such as government buildings, public housing projects, tunnels, bridges, parks, and highways.” (Anderson, 42) At the time, Venezuela had a growing middle class with high standards of living and attracted hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Latin America and Europe; with a splendid university, a first-rate art museum, an elegant country club, a string of fine hotels, and exquisite beaches, Caracas used to live up to its reputation as one of the most attractive and modern cities in Latin America. But now, the old Caracas is “barely perceptible today after decades of neglect, poverty, corruption, and social upheaval.” (Anderson, 42) The city now has one of the highest homicide rates in the world and tripled since Chavez took office; an estimated thirty-six hundred people out of the total population of three million were murdered last year, or one murder every two hours. Other than the lack of federal crime enforcement, the city is also jammed with “traffic for hours everyday, polluted with a foul-smelling river that runs through the heart of the city river trash piling up on the side, and filled with drug addicts, homeless people, and the mentally ill.” (Anderson, 42) Anderson cleverly gives his readers the two vastly different images of Caracas before and of present day. Has the