Question #1: In your class presentations as well as in my Supreme Court case summaries (especially in cases like Marbury, Dred Scott, Bush v. Gore and Citizens United), it could be argued that the Supreme Court (at least in certain periods) decides cases more as a political matter than consistently following rigid legal rules and rationales. Having sat through multiple presentations, what are your thoughts on this issue? Do you believe the Court is apolitical or political in its rulings and why or why not? Ultimately, I do feel that the Supreme Court is political in its rulings. Perhaps I am a bit of an idealist, but I do believe that the Supreme Court truly attempts to follow rigid legal rules, and rationales. I do not feel that the Supreme Court consciously makes decisions on the sole basis of potential political outcome. In my opinion, however, I feel that the idea truly apolitical judicial system is near impossible. Our judicial system is founded on the …show more content…
If so, what reform? If not, why not? Without ever having attended law school, I find it difficult to form a hard opinion on this topic. After my 1 L year, I feel that I will have a better insight into this issue. Until then, I do not feel comfortable expressing opinions on hot topics such as whether the Socratic Method is an effective or an antiquated style of teaching, or if class ranking contributes to hostility among students. However, based on my undergraduate experience and Capstone course material, I do feel strongly about the student debt crisis. It is no secret that students are drowning in financial debt, and law students are no exception. Although the characters in The Rooster Bar certainly took excessive and dramatic efforts to avoid the loan servicers, I do feel that it illustrated the desperation financial burdens insight in