Truth and Plato Essay

Words: 1056
Pages: 5
Open Document
Plato
The story of two sisters, Melissa and Melinda, is one of deep philosophical analysis. The harsh scenario is of the two sisters’ brother, Matthew, who is involved in a horrific accident that essentially leaves him brain dead and only alive through a complex network of life support systems. According to Matthew’s last will and testament, he states specifically that if something of this sort ever happens to him, both sisters must mutually agree upon the ultimate decision of whether or not to proverbially “pull the plug.” This is a massive decision that will take great deliberation upon both parties to inevitably come to common terms with one another. Essentially, both sisters have their own aspect of what they should do regarding …show more content…
He described our knowledge of equality by explaining that, “even though we have never seen any two things that are perfectly equal, because there will always be some minute difference; and yet we know what true equality (or the Form of Equality) must be.”(2) He thought that the same was true with many other things. Although we experience imperfect examples of these things, we have a somewhat real understanding of what is truth, beauty, or goodness. Plato differentiated this kind of knowledge from the seemingly unreliable knowledge that we gain through our five senses and appear to be only opinion based. Plato believed that this knowledge must be instinctive, and must have been gained by our souls before we were born. As we begin to understand something that is the object of true knowledge, like a basic math problem, that is not available to the human senses but is true. Regardless, we have some sense of recognition. As for Melinda, this should be enough evidence to prove to Melissa that Matthew’s soul pre-existed Matthew’s body and will continue to exist thereafter.
Melissa may remain skeptical after hearing what Melinda had to say, arguing that the soul does in fact exist before, during, and after the existence of the human body. She could argue that the soul is the life of a human and that when the human is gone, as is the soul. Melissa could negate Melinda’s argument of opposites by easily claiming that these are just
Show More

Related Documents: Truth and Plato Essay

Plato: Truth and Cave Essay

Plato The "Allegory of the Cave" by Plato, represents what we believe is reality and what is not. It is considered to be the most beautiful and famous metaphor in Western philosophy. This metaphor is supposed to represent that what we see through our senses is not reality, but only an artificial world. In order to see this real world, one must be intelligent and know that knowledge cannot be handed down from teacher to pupil. A student mind must be directed towards what is real and what…

Words 476 - Pages 2

Plato: Truth and Reality Essay

they think they aren't right about something because of other peoples thoughts,opioions, and just because everyone believes the opposite.What you think might be truer than you think because the world tends to believe what they want to and not the truth. In Plato’s philosophical example of life in the “Allegory of the Cave” he explains and questions his views on human existence and the reality of things. Everyone has a different reality and a way that they perceive things but other factors like the…

Words 600 - Pages 3

Essay about What Is Truth - Comparison of Plato and Peirce's Philosophy

What is Truth? For thousands of years, mankind has persistently pursued truth, knowledge, and understanding. For most, this pursuit is a driving force which usually doesn't end until one finds a "truth" that is satisfying to him or her. Even then, however, one may choose to look for an alternate truth that may be even more satisfying to them. This pursuit does not always follow the same path for everyone as there are different ideas as to how truth is actually obtained and which is the best way…

Words 975 - Pages 4

Plato's Allegory Of The Cave Summary

Plato describes knowledge as things that are unchanging in the eternal, that it is unchanging and needs to be grasped to understand to truth of life and the world. Plato’s story in Book VII really helps to reader understand what exactly he is trying to explain. He tells a story about the Allegory of the Cave and in the cave Plato talks about prisoners who sit in the dark and watches the shadows on the wall to be told what the “truth” is on the outside world. They are not to turn around or look side…

Words 970 - Pages 4

Truthful Account And Truth

The difference between a “truthful account” and “Truth” is that a truthful account is someone's perception of events as they see them. Truth is an absolute imperative untouched by human viewpoint. Perception is not reality; there will always be a natural judgement or bias to someone’s account of something. A person may tell what they believe to be the truth from their personal account but it is only a small part of the story. There are so many other factors that are impossible to gather together to obtain the pure truth. Human’s natural rational way of thinking…

Words 328 - Pages 2

Essay Greek Rhetorical Theory

Aristotle and Plato played a major role in defining and exploring the philosophies of rhetoric. Even though Aristotle spent most of his life being educated by Plato, they have contrasting views on rhetoric. Aristotle defined rhetoric into detailed classifications, while Plato focused more on the soul of the audience in relation to rhetoric. These differing ideas are the pillars for which the uses of rhetoric have been built upon. Plato is usually associated with the belief of divine truth and its…

Words 958 - Pages 4

Analogy Of The Cave Essay

'Show what ideas Plato is trying to convey in his analogy of the cave' Plato was an ancient Greek philosopher. In his book ‘the republic’ he uses the analogy of the cave to highlight the importance of reasoning and questioning in order to understand, as opposed to just accepting things at face value. In the Analogy there are a group of prisoners, who have been chained in a cave their whole life. They are chained to prevent them ever looking round to see anything. Behind them is a fire and in front…

Words 808 - Pages 4

Explain Plato's Analogy Of The Cave Essay

good. Through the allegory Plato shows clearly his beliefs about the relations of the world of appearances and the world of reality. The reasoning behind many of Plato’s beliefs is that he thought ‘the senses can be mistaken, but knowledge gained through philosophical reasoning was certain’ The allegory shows a contrast of the people who see only appearances but mistake them for the truth because it is all that they know; and the people who see nothing but the truth. Plato shows this contrast through…

Words 965 - Pages 4

Aristotle And Isocrates Rhetoric

best used. Plato, Isocrates and Aristotle each give distinct standpoints on the matter, they not only challenge but also break down any pre-existing notions about rhetoric. This brings us to the second aspect of this paper, relating the work of those three scholars to the older knowledge and work presented and taught by the sophists regarding argument and related discourse. there is ample evidence that Aristotle and Isocrates had particular views on the Sophists, however it was Plato the responded…

Words 1107 - Pages 5

Essay Poi8 Chap03 SG

CHAPTER 3: SOCRATES, PLATO Main Points 1. Plato (c. 427–347 B.C.) was the pupil of Socrates (470–399 B.C.), and Aristotle (384–322 B.C.) was the pupil of Plato. Socrates 2. Socrates was not interested in arguing with his fellow Athenians merely for the sake of argument—as the Sophists were—but rather he wanted to discover the essential nature of knowledge, justice, beauty, goodness, and the virtues (such as courage). 3. The Socratic (dialectic) method: a search for the proper definition of…

Words 1003 - Pages 5