The layout of the Scoring Rubric look OK, I would probably place the exercise sheet first showing the Task, Conditions and Standards, followed by the grading sheet and finally the complete score sheet. I know the graders can comprehend the layout easily, but I always like to think about having to present the matrix to an appeal judge or auditor.
Criteria Scale:
This section appears to be broken into two primary sections, the first section accounts for 30% of the grade and the second section accounting for 70% of the grade. Within the first primary section there are three sub-sections using a scoring of 0-3, It is not clear to me how these sections are being scored. Sub-section 1 has nine questions, Subsection 2 has thirteen questions and subsection 3 has eight questions with two questions grayed out. Are the question a YES/NO score or is each question a 0-3 score, is each question weighted for a certain section. There needs to be clearer written instruction on how exactly this page is to be scored.…show more content… On the TV show “Dancing with the stars” one judge will give a “7” while a different judge will give a “9”, both judges are watching the same dance. Is the test looking for a “Mean average” between the judges or is there a list of scoring ranges based on acceptable criteria? I think a “judging list” showing examples of the ranges would be more objective then the current subjective evaluation. What is the difference between a 6 & 8 on proper color balance or proper composition, both can be rather subjective. for instance, if I send in a CD of images for evaluation, can you assure me all three judges have the same calibrated monitor as I
