4 Resurrection Jesus Comparison

Words: 1621
Pages: 7

As of today the oldest completed Bible dates back to 327 A.D. Since then scribes have been producing copies of copies of all the books in the Bible. This leads one to ask how reliable is the Bible? How much of it is God’s word? Looking just at the four resurrection accounts of Jesus the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John have many differences, but they also share many similarities. Although there are differences between these accounts the heart of the message remains the same through them all. Jesus Christ was crucified, and rose back to life three days later. Although there are some differences between the four gospels, that message never changes. As previously mentioned there are many differences between the four resurrection accounts. …show more content…
In Matthew the description is vivid, for he uses similes to describe the characteristics of the angel. “His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow.” (Matthew 28:3). There was an earthquake when the angel arrived down from heaven. (Matthew 29:2). In Matthew, the Angel was sitting on the stone that was covering the tomb. Mark lacks that descriptive imagery of the angel. When the women arrive to the tomb they find the angel sitting inside of it. The angel is described simply as, “… a young man dressed in a white robe…” (Mark 16:5). Luke and John diverge from Matthew and Mark. In Luke the women find an empty tomb with the stone rolled away. Then two angels appear and stand next to them. (Luke 24:4). John is particularly unique from the other accounts because when Mary Magdalene first arrived at the tomb she did not encounter an angel. She saw that the stone had been removed and went to tell Peter and the other disciple. Later on when she was weeping by the tomb, and she looked in to see that there were two angels dressed in white sitting where Jesus was laid. (John …show more content…
It leaves readers asking many questions. Such as, “ Did anyone end up seeing Jesus after he was resurrected?” The author of Mark was attempting to reach out to Romans, and he portrayed Jesus as a servant. He refers to him as the, “ Son of Man,” and not the son of God. He shows that Jesus does not know everything and has limited knowledge. He attempts to prove to his audience that “human” Jesus was like one of them. When describing the angel in the tomb the gospel of Mark simply states, “..they saw a young man dressed in a white robe…” (Mark 16:5). This description is completely different from the one in Matthew. The gospel of Mark shows us that a servant sacrificed his own life for humanity. There is a sense of urgency that is trying to convince the Romans that the kingdom of God is near. The gospel of Luke is reaching out to the Greeks, and is written to Theophilus meaning “lover of God.” It portrays Jesus as a teacher, a perfect man. In Luke 24:27, Luke 24:44-49, Jesus is teaching the gospel, and opening the minds of the disciples so that they could understand the scriptures. I believe that Luke was trying to show the Greeks that there is salvation right here and right now. He was also trying to show them that Jesus is the long awaited