A Rhetorical Analysis Of Road Kill By Gregg Easterbrook

Words: 722
Pages: 3

Gregg Easterbrook, a fellow in the Brookings Institution, writes in his article for the Los Angeles Times, “Road Kill,” that cars and the people driving are posing a threat to the rest of the public, and there needs to be more attention brought to the fatal crashes happening on the road. In his article, Easterbrook explains that deaths on the road are going unnoticed to the public, and how our world can reduce road accidents by knowing their impact on people, cell phone use while driving, and by car manufacturers setting standards on horsepower (A3-5). Easterbrook discusses the broader issue of traffic deaths in the United States, and around the world. He argues that media attention is being brought to the tragedies of 9/11, but nobody is caring about the 245,000 lives lost in traffic accidents during the same period. He believes that the press and media are choosing to overlook this issue, but people need to pay more attention. Traffic deaths aren’t just in America, they are …show more content…
He believes that the environment is also taking a hit due to higher horsepower in cars. Easterbrook would like auto companies to put their money towards improving the fuel efficiency in vehicles. Not the horsepower. He also says that cars with high horsepower are extremely easy to lose control of, especially for a teenage driver. Easterbrook thinks that with more horsepower people are becoming reckless on the road. On the highway, people are making sudden lane changes, and cutting each other off. This can cause more fatal and devastating accidents. Easterbrook assumes that congress could easily set limits on the amount of horsepower if they were willing to take the time to do it. To Easterbrook, with horsepower regulations and serious enforcement against cell phone use, we are able to save thousands of lives each year in the United States