A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Words: 606
Pages: 3

It was a sunny day, the sky was clear and the crowd was waiting for Martin Luther King’s speech, the last speech of the day. As he began to talk about his vision and the dream he had, people started to admire what he was saying and were touched by what he said. Martin was not with anyone else during his speech, it was just him talking to hundreds and hundreds of people in Washington DC. The more he talked about his dream, the more the crowd was screaming in agreement to what he said. Martin's speech had a humongous meaning; his dream of blacks and whites being equal, where there was no difference. Martin could see how the crowd was agreeing with the words he said and that is how he influenced people to support what he stranded for. But all of this didn't start magically, Martin himself had to do all of this. He started small by himself, but as the time went on, more and more people followed him. the story of Martin shows how many times an individual has the power to …show more content…
Hitler can be an example because he didn't start with a group of people he started all by himself . Hitler dec dead to let the Germans know that all the problems were caused by the Jews and how if they get rid of the Jews then all their problems would disappear if they get rid of the Jews. He constantly fed them with lies about the Jews and how they were the problem. Eventually Hitler got himself an army really quick and in no time they started to conquer and destroy many of the Jews buildings, temples and many other things. A second example is towards the end of the play when Drummond changes the people’s perspective of Evolution. At the beginning of the trial, the Judge and he people of Hillsboro hated Drummond and every word that came out of his mouth was poisonous to them. The Judge was really against Drummond that when Drummond asked for