Amelie

Words: 448
Pages: 2

On September 19th, I was lucky enough to be offered a ticket to see Amelie at the Berkeley repertory theater. The show opened on August 29th of this year. As a fan of the original movie, I was very skeptical about the idea of a magical movie being turned into a musical. Those fears were laid to rest once I saw the unique additions that the musical led by the direction of Pam Mackinnon, added to separate itself from the film. Amelie is a film that that is built around very beautiful and unique cinematography that ties into the vast imagination of it's titular character. The biggest difference between the film and the musical is the production design. Where as the film has a vast and vivid feel to the cinematography, the musical, designed by David Zinn, is the antithesis of the film's look. I was surprised and pleased by the fact that the show did not try and use a more elaborate stage design and instead opted to go with a simplistic …show more content…
While Crawford's performance is endearing and great for her age, Barks' performance steals the show. Tautou and Barks' interpretations of Amelie are so different from one another that comparing them would be unfair to either actress. The film version of Amelie was played much more childlike and cartoonish while the musical version of Amelie feels much more mature, which may be attributed to the difference between the English and French languages. Bark's Amelie, along with the rest of the do not speak in French or even speak in a French accent. Amelie's love interest(Nino) is played by Adam-Chanler-Jones, who shares a considerable amount of chemistry with Barks. The acting between the two is much less cartoonish as the Nino/Amelie relationship is portrayed in the film. The biggest difference between the show and the film is the fact that this show is a musical where as the film did not feature dialogue sung by the