Analysis Of Anthony Burgess A Clockwork Orange

Words: 557
Pages: 3

The writing style of Anthony Burgess in A Clockwork Orange is unique and playful with its style of writing and diction. To start off, Anthony Burgess uses a different language incorporated with English words. This language in the novel is called nadsat which is a slang language that uses Russian words or Cockney accent. The way that Burgess utilizes the slang language is to create a more playful tone during the dialogue of the characters. Since most readers won’t understand half of what is being said during the nadsat dialogue it is left to the reader to use the sounds of the words to try and understand the dialogue. An example of this dialogue is in part 1, chapter 1, page 3, where it states, “ ‘There was me, that is Alex, and my three droogs, that is Pete, Georgie, and Dim, …show more content…
33). This represents irony because Burgess point out that the bleeding Dim was bleeding so rapidly it was almost as if it were singing. This irony also creates a comedic relief from a serious situation that could have potentially escalated to something more intense. Burgess also utilizes symbolism in many of the novels objects. For example, The classical music at first symbolizes artful pieces that would go along with violent crimes. Another piece of symbolism is the clockwork orange that symbolizes the society's well being which is not in the best shape in the novel. The last literary device that Burgess utilizes is repetition. Burgess uses repetition multiple times but the most significant phrase repeated is “What’s it going to be, eh.” Burgess uses this phrase multiple times, although in each of the occasions it has a different meaning to it. In some occasions it used as a question from Alex to his friends and in others it is used as a question directed at Alex in a more serious occasion. The writing style of Burgess is playful, juvenile, and unique which creates a novel symbolizes the journey of its protagonist, the protagonist being young and immature but clever in his