In her quest to open parents' eyes all across the country to the numerous benefits technology has to offer children, Dockterman emphasizes a persuasive, conversational tone throughout her essay. Throughout her argument, the author pushes her point on guardians in numerous ways. From the very start of her argument, up until the end, factual evidence is given to support her position, as well as invalidate counter points. She uses emotional diction to persuade the parents that while technology can cause certain problems to potentially arise, some technology is essential for future success. Dockterman also counters her critics with addressing their points by outweighing them with the benefits technology presents.
The author immediately launches…show more content… She approaches her counterargument most effectively with the widespread use of language that gives technology its bad wrap. "Cyberbullying...depressed...insecure...obesity...violence..." these phrases are the ones that strike fear into parent's hearts across the country, and that's why she chose to use them in her counter. If she didn't address this for parents herself, they would've been quick to point out these aspects. Dockterman's diction continues throughout the argument, and effectively pulls parents to her side by playing on the concerns they have for their children. "...essential skills for jobs... 'they're going to be left behind.'" When discussing how technology can further kid's future careers, especially with the growing influence of technology in the workforce, Dockterman knows this alone will persuade her audience to see her side, but decides to take it all a step further by pulling on their heartstrings. No parent wants to deprive their child of the skills they need to be successful, or feel as if their child is being "left behind." This paragraph filled with parental fears, was created to send parents to the local Best Buy in search for a
