Appellant Discrimination Case Study

Words: 559
Pages: 3
Open Document
5R) The Appellant Meetings, Out of Class and Senior Executive Rotation Assignments Review Rebuttal:
The Appellant is attaching additional evidence to support the Appellant claim. The Appellant listed discrimination by excluding the Appellant from a range of opportunities that include being excluded out meetings, out-of-class assignments, rotation assignments which are acts by Caltrans that violate the EEO laws and Caltrans policies. Participating in meetings, training, and assignments would have helped the Appellant enhance his skills and broaden this experience that the Appellant could have used these examples when applying for the Career Executive Assignment, the Supervising Bridge Engineer promotions, and other promotions opportunities. …show more content…
As far as the project transfer meeting the Appellant referred to, Ross Cather was not present in the meeting. The Appellant will include a list of attendees that where in the meeting. Here is what took place, the Appellant came to the meeting 10 minutes late because he was attending to another work related issue and when the Appellant sat down for about 5 minutes in the project transfer meeting, Mario Orso, TCIF Director looked at the Appellant and asked the Appellant to leave the meeting telling the Appellant you are not needed here since there are no utilities in this project. What proves this has discriminatory intent is that Syndi Sutter, Utility R/W Coordinator (white female) who was at the project transfer meeting from the beginning was not asked to leave the
Show More

Related Documents: Appellant Discrimination Case Study

Loving Vs Virginia

For my reaction paper, I will be covering the Supreme Court Case Loving v. Virginia. The Appellant of the case is Richard Loving and the Appellee is the State of Virginia. Richard Loving is a a white man who married Mildred Jeter, a black woman in DC. They resided in Virginia but traveled to DC to get married legally. After acquiring the marriage certificate, they moved back to Virginia. However, the state of Virginia enacted laws that labeled interracial marriages as a felony. It was their antimiscegenation…

Words 1136 - Pages 5

Essay on Womens Rights

years in 1916, she became the first female judge in Canada and the British Empire. In her first case on July 1st, 1916, she found a prisoner guilty but the prisoner argued that he cannot be sentenced by someone who is not a “person”. The municipal court agreed with the prisoner. Murphy was furious and took the case to the supreme court of Canada where it was ruled women not “persons” and later talking the case to the privy counsel in England where it was ruled that women were indeed legally “persons”…

Words 2220 - Pages 9

POL330 Midterm#1 Essay

POL330 Exam1 2. Minor v. Happerset [Holding: The Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee women the right to vote.] [overruled by Amendment 19th, 1920] [summary: Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 1Si (1875), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote. The Supreme Court upheld state court decisions in Missouri, which had refused to register a woman as a lawful voter because that state's laws allowed only men to vote.…

Words 3008 - Pages 13

Principles Of The Australian Parliamentary System

UNIT 3 Area of Study 1: Parliament and the citizen • [principles of the Australian parliamentary system: representative government, responsible government, and the separation of powers] Representative government Outlined in the C/W Constitution and is vital to Australia's parliamentary system. It ensures that there is a government made up of representatives who are chosen by the people. In order to ensure a representative government exists, regular elections are held e.g. elections for H/Reps are…

Words 6752 - Pages 28

Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Provisions

the requester may request an administrative adjudication in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Appeals Act. In such cases, the ruling authorities on the disposition or omission made by the public agencies other than the state or local governments, shall be the heads of central administrative agencies concerned. (2) The requester may request an administrative ruling without…

Words 6669 - Pages 27