Argument Against Animal Testing

Words: 586
Pages: 3

In my opinion, I feel as if there is no point to animal testing. Testing on animals is kind of the same as testing on human beings. We are not much of a difference beside that fact that humans walk on two legs and animals walk on four, and we talk rather than an unknown language and we also wear clothes to cover up while they wear their very own fur. Researchers think that just because of these differences between us and animals that it is okay to test on them for our very own selfishness. We say that we were all created equally, by us testing on these animals, we are going against everything that we stand for. Human rights are not more important than animals’ rights, animals’ rights are very much important as if it were the other way around. …show more content…
There are many people who are vegetarians, and are against animal testing, which prevents them from using products that have been obtained through the process of abusing animals’ rights. There is always another way to do an experiment without involving animals. We are different types of species and no matter what the experiment is, the result is never going to be the same. It is bad enough that we use animals for foods, but it is even worse using them for research. There should be an obligation among the human race to set a point or level for animal rights. This concept should be legal and it should be looked at closely. Time after time we are becoming less aware of the suffering that is caused to animals. Furthermore, animals are becoming more and more afraid in today’s world due to them not feeling safe. Animals continued to be looked at as if they were some kind of materialistic goods. Animals can feel pain, they need love, and it’s not much of a difference as to some of the same things the humans feel. We are being immoral to these species