Argumentative Essay: An Analysis Of Animal Punishment

Words: 1032
Pages: 5
Open Document
Animals should not have to go through that type of pain. How would you like it if you were stuck in a cage, then finally let out just to be in more pain? Animal testing is wrong because no living thing should have to go through that amount of pain. It is cruel and unusual punishment. Sometimes it will harm animals, but help people or help animals but harms people. Any way why use animals when we have enough knowledge to create something that we can use instead. Animals should not be used for product or medical research. To begin, some products may help animals others harm them very bad, so it is cruel and unusual punishment. In the article “Animal Testing” it states, “connect with the painful reality of what testing cosmetics on animals means. …show more content…
Many people may argue that, “Some scientists, however, have created animal testing by facilitating the development of countless medication, drugs, and medical devices and procedures that have saved millions of human lives” (“Animal Testing”). Some people have actually made some products, medicines and drugs from animal testing and have actually saved millions of lives. Secondly, “There are ‘still many areas where animal testing is necessary,’ the FDA website states, ’and non-animal testing is not yet a scientifically valid and available option yet.’,” (“Animal Testing”). Just because some medicines have been made from animal testing just thing about the torture the animals went through to get to those medicines. Also, why can they not use other methods that is what those methods are there for. However, “Plenty of alternatives to animal testing exist; scientists and researchers should avail themselves of those alternatives and let animals live in peace” (“Animal Testing”). Scientists should just leave the animals alone and let them live in peace since none of those animals have ever done anything to them. Finally, “Animals are not ours to use for experimentation,” Alistair Currie, a policy adviser for people for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), wrote in the Independent in 2012. Animals are not property of humans and humans do not own animals so they should just not use
Show More

Related Documents: Argumentative Essay: An Analysis Of Animal Punishment

English 1301 Study Guide

or English 0349, and successful completion of remedial reading courses, if required. Course description “A course devoted to improving the student's writing and critical thinking. Writing essays for a variety of purposes from personal to academic, including the introduction of argumentation, critical analysis, and the use of sources. Core Curriculum course” (HCC Catalog). Course Goals English 1301 is part of the Core Curriculum and, as such, emphasizes all of the Core Competencies: reading, writing…

Words 4013 - Pages 17