You probably think that driverless cars are so cool and amazing. They can park on there own, they can drive on their own, they’re the car of the future right?Think again, have ever just looked at the downsides of the driverless car like come on people get your head out of the sand, think outside the box. These cars are our downfall of America. Driverless cars should not be on the road.
The technology is not robust enough. Even if theoretical solutions are found, it might be hard to reliably translate them to the real world. Robustness would depend on a myriad of electronic, mechanical and software components operating with little tolerance for error under adverse (freezing, wet, boiling) conditions, long duty cycles, less than perfect maintenance (car owners being human), fender benders, network and electrical outages, and so on Think if everyone has the new driverless car and what if the it breaks down because the technology is not robust enough. Then everyone doesn't have a car to drive to work and you have to walk to your work and that can be hours away imagine that. Dr. Louise Cummings, for example, made a well-reasoned argument (how technology like the driverless car is not robust enough). Along these lines during a recent U.S. Senate committee hearing (Document of the U.S. Senate Committee about Driverless Cars).This goes along with my reason that technology is not robust enough because U.S. Senate (Dr. Louise Cummings) made a argument that states…show more content… Driverless cars are bad, but I can’t demand to not like them. You choose that driverless cars are cool and let 10% of the world go homeless or don’t support driverless cars and everyone can be happy and live a great life. Now do you want support driverless
