Argumentative Essay: Should Trophy Hunting Be Allowed?

Words: 631
Pages: 3

Africa gets over fifty thousand dollars from one man to kill a lion, and as little as three percent of those funds go to the community and conservationist. Trophy hunting is harming animals and the community this is just one reason trophy hunting shouldn’t be allowed. Trophy hunting should not be allowed or legal. People think that killing lions is protecting themselves and other humans, but that just means that the food chain will be thrown off. People and wildlife need to get along and with trophy hunting that might not happen.
To begin with, trophy hunting should not be allowed for the revenue is not used properly. The text entitled Africa’s Uneasy Neighbor it states that “Little as three percent of the funds from trophy hunting go to the communities”. The text of Africa’s Uneasy Neighbors states that tourism brings six million dollars annually to Africa.” This shows that the revenue is not used properly and it doesn’t help anyone but the companies that sell licenses for trophy hunting. If tourism brings six million dollars annually, then why do they need to have trophy hunting.
People and wildlife need to coexist. People and animals need to coexist for they are so close together. The text of Africa’s uneasy neighbors states that “fifty five percent of
…show more content…
Trophy hunting should be allowed for it provides opportunities or revenue for animal conservation. The text of Africa’s Uneasy Neighbors it states that “Conservation groups and wildlife management experts contend that regulated hunting actually helps protect animals by generating funds for conservations. That part is true, but not as important because the revenue isn’t used properly. There are many reasons that trophy hunting should be allowed, however there are more important reasons that it should not be allowed. The funds or revenue isn’t used properly and the money doesn’t go to the communities those are just two reasons when there are a lot