Arguments Against Big Game Hunting

Words: 536
Pages: 3

Big Game Hunting
The death and suffrage of animals are a part of hunting. My claim is that big game hunting should continue. My three reasons to support my claim are people don’t waste the animal. Second if we take out the aggressive animal out of the herds then more calves will be born. Third the money being made to buy the permits will go to the country's government to protect the endangered animals. The first reason I have to support my claim is that people don't waste the animal, For example the people who go out and buy a permit to hunt an animal and go out and shoot one they use every part of the animal so none of the animal is left behind. (“LIke the rhino, primarily for its horn, which is valuable on the international black market for endangered animals and animal parts. Made
…show more content…
Some evidence to prove this is “Jackson said all of the money from the auction would go into a bank account, which will be held until the hunting permit is approved by Namibia. At that point, the money will then be sent to the government of Namibia for the sole purpose of protecting rhinos and their habitat.” (“Safari Club President Ben Carter said the money will be "enormously meaningful in Namibia's fight to ensure the future of its black rhino populations.") He called the group's rhino auction the best strategy to preserve the endangered species. "The conservation hunt is a hero in the hunting community." While others may say that Big game hunting should be illegal I say big game hunting should continue. My three reasons to support my claim are people don’t waste the animal. Second if we take out the aggressive animal out of the herds then more calves will be born. Third the money being made to buy the permits will go to the country's government to protect the endangered animals. That is why big game hunting should