Arguments Against Campaign Finance Reform

Words: 797
Pages: 4

Imagine an infrastructure in which the main function is to support the views and beliefs of the citizens it represents. If this infrastructure were to be compromised by groups that contribute money to individuals elected to represent thousands of citizens, a conflict of interests would arise. This infrastructure actually exists in American politics today, with little concern for the vast majority of the population. It has become a vicious cycle of lobbyists, politicians, and big business rubbing elbows to help boost profits and win elections. The “one percent” is drowning out the concerns of the American people to benefit their own interests. Campaign finance reform, if left unchecked, may allow a window for major corporations to buy any political seat or office they choose, and therefor allow the country be run by corporate affairs. New laws must be put into place in order to contain major donators influence and to redistribute equality to all citizens, no matter how large or small their political contributions may be, through an anonymous system. New laws which dictate strictly anonymous donations will quiet the agendas of massive …show more content…
If the people of the United States do not address this issue it is possible that the government will become more of a business instead of what the founding fathers intended it to be: “…by the people, for the people”. If the situation does progress, the government could become a complete money obsessed entity; rubbing elbows and eliciting favors of one another for their own personal gain. A company could take advantage and extort this system in such ways such as asking their beneficiary to allow them to continue polluting certain areas and keeping this information confidential. If hundreds of companies asked the same favor, the world could possibly be looking at a potential catastrophic environmental