Arguments Against Exclusionary Rule

Words: 410
Pages: 2
Open Document
The exclusionary rule is a judge-made rule, adopted by the courts to stop the police from conducting illegal searches and seizures. The constitution merely says the people shall be free from unreasonable searches. It doesn't say what the courts should do once an unreasonable search and seizure has taken place. The courts finally decided on the exclusionary rule, the rule that says that evidence illegally seized may not be used as evidence, as a means of enforcement. "We're sorry" doesn't quite cut it. The courts gave as their rationale for the rule the concept of "unclean hands." If the courts, the symbol of our highest justice, use evidence they know to be illegally obtained, they condone through their use of the evidence the illegal action …show more content…
It has been debated since its inception and throughout its development whether the courts had the right to "create" this remedy, whether it really serves the intended purpose of protecting our constitutional right to privacy, and whether it has any actual deterrence effect with the police. As crime rates and organized crime have been on the upswing, the efficacy and legitimacy of the rule continues to be called into question. In recent years it has been eroded by such policies as the "good faith" exception, which says that even if a warrant is invalid, more than six months old, if the police believe it in "good faith" to be valid, the exclusionary rule will not …show more content…
"To enforce the Fourth Amendment we rely on the exclusionary rule, first adopted by the Supreme court in 1914 in Weeks v. United States, and applied to the states in 1961 in Mapp v. Ohio. " Peltason, Understanding the Constitution, p.149. The exclusionary rule does not apply to violations by purely private individuals, as established by Burdeau v. McDowell (1921) 256 U.S.465, 41 S.Ct. 574, 65 L.Ed. 1048 and followed ever since. However the ruling does apply to private citizens acting under color of law, as established in United States v. Price (1965) 383 U.S. 787, 86 S.Ct. 1152, 16 L.Ed.2d 267. [California interpretation of Price: Stapleton v. Superior Court, (1968) 70 Cal.2d 97, 101, 73 Cal.Rptr. 575, 447 P.2d 967.] (California State University, Dominguez
Show More

Related Documents: Arguments Against Exclusionary Rule

Exclusionary Rule Research Paper

” — Justice Joseph P. Bradley The Exclusionary Rule is available to a Defendant in a criminal case as a remedy for illegal searches that violate the rights set forth in the Fourth Amendment. When applicable, the rule dictates that the evidence illegally obtained must be excluded as evidence under the Fourth Amendment. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643. One important corollary to the Exclusionary Rule is the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine. This rule holds that, in addition to the material…

Words 1292 - Pages 6

Bennie Herring Case Summary

for possession of a controlled substance and illegal possession of a firearm. Herring tried to suppress the evidence during his trial under the exclusionary rule, but his request was denied. Herring appealed his conviction and his case was eventually picked up and heard by the United States Supreme Court, which ended…

Words 1722 - Pages 7

Supreme Court Case: Mapp V. United States

based her argument on First Amendment grounds, arguing she had a right to possess the explicit material. When the case reached the Supreme Court, they did not address her First Amendment claim but nullified her conviction for another reason. The court said that the evidence used against Mapp should never have been admitted in trial because it was seized without a legitimate warrant which violated her Fourth amendment rights. The Court addressed concerns of Mapp’s 4th Amendment protection against “unreasonable…

Words 575 - Pages 3

People V. Krivda Case Study

Jenny Strancer asked for and received as search warrant and was able to arrest Greenwood. Greenwood was able to post bail and was quickly freed. On the 4th of May in 1984 a different investigator took up the Greenwood case. Robert Rahaeuser once against took Greenwood’s trash bags and later obtained a search warrant. After finding more proof of his drug dealing the police once again arrested Greenwood. The Superior Court of Orange County did not find Greenwood guilty because in People v. Krivda…

Words 932 - Pages 4

Pros And Cons Exclusionary Rule

1. The Exclusionary rule is one of the most effective ways to revitalize the fourth amendment to the constitution. The reason there are so many arguments in court that abrades its usefulness is because it’s not mentioned anywhere within the constitution. For example, when it comes to civil cases, the exclusionary rule has no power or position. Furthermore, when it comes down to those in deportation hearings, they do not have the exclusionary rule to back them up. In addition, based on the state you…

Words 733 - Pages 3

Walt White Case Study

instructed the officer not to look in the bag. Probable cause now exists and the officer has every right to search the content of the bag. The search would be protected under the vehicle exclusionary rule of search warrants. Right to revoke would not apply as there is probable cause and vehicle exclusionary rule to protect the search at this point. Mr. White’s arrest in regards to possession of cocaine. The arrest was justified as the discovery of the cocaine was due to permission granted for…

Words 1145 - Pages 5

Law terms Essay

Adversarial system: U.S.; Contest between two opposing parties Inquisitional system: Europe; judge questions witnesses and controls the court process, also gathers evidence. Trier of fact: (judge of jury) determines truth if opposing parties present their arguments/show weakness Burden of Proof: evidence; requirement to win a point Beyond a reasonable doubt: level of proof required to convict person of a crime Preponderance of evidence: civil suit standard of proof Motion: (pretrial) a formal request that a…

Words 473 - Pages 2

Mapp V. Ohio Summary

The decision was affirmed by the Ohio Court of Appeals. Mapp appealed the conviction to the Ohio Supreme Court, which supported the conviction although it recognized a sensible reversal argument since the materials and evidence was obtained illegally. Mapp took the case to the United States Supreme Court and stated that her conviction was a result of illegal search and seizure. Issue…

Words 541 - Pages 3

Powerpoint for perry Essay

actions and not state disputes. Weeks V. United States Argued: December 2, 1913 Decided: February 24, 1914 Issue Whether to allow private documents to be seized and then held as evidence against citizens would have meant that the protection of the Fourth Amendment declaring the right to be secure against such searches and seizures would be of no value whatsoever. Background On December 21, 1911 Fremont Weeks was arrested at his work. At the time of arrest, the officer conducted a search of…

Words 1603 - Pages 7

The Microsoft Antitrust Case Essay

antitrust litigation, and is used to “combat anticompetitive practices, reduce market domination by individual corporations, and preserve unfettered competition as the rule of trade” (www.law.cornell.edu). The DOJ concentrated on 4 specific violations of the Act, (1) Microsoft engaged in “unlawful exclusive dealings and other exclusionary agreements”, (2) Microsoft engaged in “unlawful tying”, which was the act of Microsoft tying together two products…

Words 1354 - Pages 6