Arguments Against Flag Burning

Words: 227

Pages: 1

Flag Burning
Flag burning is a demonstration of people who have no respect for their country or themselves. Flag burning is protected by freedom of speech, and it is heavily monitored by the Supreme Court. Today flag burning is used to demonstrate violence and hatred crimes that purveys terroristic threats against america.
Why flag burning should be illegal; in 1942 President Roosevelt approved the federal flag code to maintain the actions that are committed against the american flag(roosevelt,1942). In 1987 desecrated states adopted on organized flag protection movement that was created in reaction to perceived commercial and political misuse of the flag(roosevelt, 1987). Even though there is no actual law preventing someone from not burning

Show More

Flag Burning Persuasive Essay

is also referred as a disrespectful action with the flag. This is a debate among the people whether is it legal or illegal, because some people say it’s a very disrespectful action and others say that if the people that do it are punished it can be a violation against their 1st amendment. The disrespectful act of burning the nation’s flag should be punished whenever someone does it. Currently in The United States of America flag burning is not illegal because the supreme court decided that…

Words 644 - Pages 3

Gregory Lee Johnson Case Study

Case 491 U.S. 397, 109 S.Ct. 2533 argued March 21, 1989 and was decided June 21, 1989. The issue in Texas v. Gregory Lee Johnson was the desecration of the American flag as a political protest protected under the freedom of expression clauses of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. While the Republican National Convention was taking place in Dallas in 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson participated in a political demonstration called the “Republican War Chest Tour.” The purpose of the demonstration was to…

Words 864 - Pages 4

Essay On Flag Burning

Is flag burning a part of speech, many people have opinions on this question but the answer still remains unknown. To help out my statement the united states Supreme Court ruled in Texas against Johnson in 1989 that flag burning is protected by the First Amendment's Free Speech. President bush prohibited flag burning in the united state of America because due to the fact that a man publicly burnt the Stars upon hearing that the civil rights leader James Meredith had been shot. Another example to…

Words 1032 - Pages 5

Argumentative Essay: The First Amendment

O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968), the Supreme Court argued David Paul O’Brien’s action of burning his draft card. “On the morning of March 31, 1966, David Paul O’Brien and three companions burned their Selective Service registration certificates on the steps of the South Boston Courthouse” (United). Many people witnessed the event including some…

Words 2512 - Pages 11

Texas Vs. Johnson Argument Analysis

The American Flag Stands For Tolerance" there are many examples of people judging or discriminating people because their opinions or thought are not the same as ours. In the readings that I have gathered, no matter the topic, people are going to disagree and people are going to be mean to each other. In the text , "Texas Vs. Johnson", judgement is show towards Johnson because of how he chooses to show his disagreement with government policies. "Indeed, Texas' argument that the burning of the American…

Words 712 - Pages 3

Texas Vs Johnson Majority Opinion Analysis

Texas and the minority of the court is against the flag burning and they state why they think it’s unacceptable. “Indeed, Texas' argument that the burning of an American flag "is an act having a high likelihood to cause a breach of the peace." (Pg. 16 Lines 19-21). Texas and the minority feel as if flag burning is unacceptable, they argued and expressed themselves to show the importance of the American flag and their opinions. Other say that the flag burning is okay and is protected by the constitution…

Words 799 - Pages 4

Negative Effects Of Civil Disobedience

press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble” (Corwin, 1920). This aspect of American government separates it from other countries, but it has led to acts of protests that have reached certain extremes. One instance of this is flag burning, which goes against the nationalistic ideals of many citizens. The Supreme Court Case, Texas v. Johnson, ruled on June 21, 1989 that doing so was a non-violent and symbolic act that is…

Words 758 - Pages 4

Essay On The First Amendment

citizens are allowed their first amendment rights is gradually becoming a large problem. What are the limitations of the first amendment? Should these limits be increased? These questions have led to further debatable arguments dealing with the first amendment: the burning of the American flag. So, should Congress have the…

Words 934 - Pages 4

Rhetorical Analysis

primary subject, though foreign affairs and the technology age were briefly mentioned by the author. Moreover, all of his arguments were achieved through a liberal bias, partly explaining why he has a strong level of distaste for Trump (possibly). In my experiences with reading Friedman, I have been able to develop a deeper understanding of the liberal side of the partisan argument, as I associate myself with Conservatives, being better acquainted with the ideology associated with such views. I have…

Words 1249 - Pages 5

1st Amend and Free Speech Essay

Strickland 1 Jeff Strickland 30 September, 2009 English 1B Paper #1 Assignment: Argument and Persuasion – First Amendment and Free Speech Professor Casil The Freedom of Symbolic Speech The term symbolic speech is applied to a wide range of nonverbal communication. Many political activities, including marching, wearing armbands, and displaying or mutilating the U.S. flag, are considered forms of symbolic expression. The U. S. Supreme Court has held that this form of communicative…

Words 788 - Pages 4