Arguments Against Hate Speech

Words: 496
Pages: 2
Open Document
Pro:
Hate speech is protected free speech because the first amendment states that congress will not make a law preventing the freedom of speech, hate speech is just another way to express your opinion and finally, hate speech is just a name that people call it if they don't agree.
My first reason why hate speech is protected free speech is because the first amendment states that congress will not make a law preventing the freedom of speech. Legally, you are allowed to speak in anyway that you would like, as long as you are not physically hurting anyone. For example, the Neo-Nazis who marched in Washington, DC worked along side with the police who protected them against the counter-protesters so even though many people didn't agree with what they were doing, …show more content…
Many people get injured during protest no matter which side they’re on, because they are promoting something that is not widely accepted by people. For example, the attack in Charlottesville hurt and injured so many people and those people were the counter-protesters. Hate speech had always caused some form of counter-protest which is fine, but it is also causes a lot of wrong arrests which puts so many families under so much stress and pressure. And not only that, but the ‘prisoner’ as well.
My next reason is that in many other free countries such as Denmark and France hate speech is illegal. America is always looking to be better than other countries and then they allow people to threaten other people's lives when they are delivering their speech. This just puts more of a bad name towards America and Americans.
Finally, hate speech should not be considered free speech because it’s just really mean. That sounds really juvenile, but it’s true. Hate speech scares so many people, and then since they are scared, they join the group because they feel targeted and they want to stay “under the
Show More

Related Documents: Arguments Against Hate Speech

Summary: No Free Speech Without Hate Speech

No Free Speech Without Hate Speech The current rise of nationalism in Europe, along with the rise of Donald Trump in America has led to an increase in the use of the term “hate speech” in the nightly news reports across the country. Yet, there is no actual legal definition of Hate speech. The American Bar Association defines hate speech as , “ speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits” (“Debating…

Words 1304 - Pages 6

Dignity In The Poetry Of Waldron And Trethewey

In his book, The Harm in Hate Speech, Jeremy Waldron defines the concept of dignity as an individual’s “social standing, the fundamentals of basic reputation that entitle them to be treated as equals in the ordinary operations of society” (Waldron, 5). It is an essential part of maintaining the ability to be an active member of society. Hate speech is designed to get rid of it. Dignity is incredibly malleable and easily taken away through language. Without dignity, one loses what Waldron describes…

Words 1605 - Pages 7

R. V. Keegstra : in Support of the Dissent Essay

Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirement for PHL613, Philosophy of Law Sean Peters 500 204 129 April 11, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Overview of R. V. Keegstra 2 Why does Freedom of Speech in Democracy Matter? 2 Factors of the Offense Principle 3 Why not Moralism? 4 Philosophical Analysis 4 Criticism 6 Recommendations 7 Conclusion 8 Appendices 9 Appendix 1 - Research and Methodology 9 Works Cited…

Words 2820 - Pages 12

coomon sense Essay examples

Common Sense The first of the appendix's two parts recaps many of the arguments Paine makes in Common Sense, although the style of writing is a bit more urgent. The main points that come out of the first part of the appendix are as follows: the colonies should immediately declare independence; independence is preferable to reconciliation because it is simpler; independence is the only bond that can keep the colonies together. The way the author makes you feel is a very biased paper. Paine talked…

Words 662 - Pages 3

Pathos And Rhetoric In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Brutus, as well as make him believe that Caesar is his enemy. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar is not worth of being emperor. He speaks of Caesar saying, “Why should that name be shouted more than yours?” (JC I.ii.151-152). This is an emotional argument because he does not present any facts, or use logic, but instead invokes Brutus’s inner…

Words 1026 - Pages 5

DMiddleton Final Draft Essay

created equal.” The term “Hate Crime” defined by Public Law #103-322A, a 1994 federal law, defines a hate crime as: “a crime in which the defendant intentionally selects a victim, or in the case of a property crime, the property that is the object of the crime, because of actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any person.” Although this is the federal definition, each state has their own legal hate crime statues, which states…

Words 2260 - Pages 10

Search and Seizure in Public Schools Essay

purpose of this paper is to discuss public school districts' limits on "hate" speech and reconcile those limits with the decision in Tinker v. Des Moines. Importance to Education To avoid disturbance and disruption and to create and maintain a safe learning environment, public schools often adopt policies that forbid certain acts on the part of students. Included in many of these policies are prohibitions on hate speech. The opinion of the court in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) broadly stated…

Words 1913 - Pages 8

Hate Puppies: The First Amendment Of The United States

I Hate Puppies I don’t really hate puppies, but the freedom of speech gives me the right to say so, no matter how much you disagree with it. The first amendment of the United State’s constitution is the freedom of speech and expression. This factors into the way American culture lives and thrives. Although some say free speech should be replaced by political correctness, the freedom of speech should not be suppressed because it is a fundamental right, helps develop individuality, and is a…

Words 649 - Pages 3

Hate Speech In Colleges

Hate speech has been a highly debated topic at colleges as of late. As more and more cases of protests and expulsions have popped up, deciding what to do with students using hate speech has been an issue. Many students, especially minority groups, feel threatened by the words of others. Colleges have begun trying to suppress this free speech by implementing speech codes and punishing students for racially charged actions. Colleges claim they have implemented this to protect their students and make…

Words 1047 - Pages 5

Finding Truth In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

people are not restricted in their speech or action, so long as their speech or actions do not violate another person's’ liberty. Moreover, what Mill considers as harmful does not include harm or criticism to ideas. Instead, Mill advocates for free speech and debate, so ideas can be criticised in a rational manner, leading to logical deduction that can allow for ideas to be closer to the truth. In chapter 2, Mill argues for freedom of speech and…

Words 1560 - Pages 7