Arguments Against Racial Profiling In The United States

Words: 310
Pages: 2

Racial profiling is the use of race, ethnicity, or religion as grounds for suspecting someone committing a crime. Racial profiling was had a better term known as a Gateway Act. This term was used as an excuse to approach citizens that are accused to be criminals. Racial profiling is also known to be a target, this target singles out people of color, such as African-American’s that seem to be suspicious. Profiling of race should be illegal because it creates hostile racial tensions, civil liberties are destroyed, and equality is no longer in society.
Hostile racial tension is a negative expression of hate for people of a different race, gender, sexual orientation and even religion. A person who goes against specific dress code, cultural or moral beliefs, or religious or political ideologies are subject to hostile racism.
…show more content…
Black individuals who are getting harassed just because of their appearance violates constitutional rights as an American. “Racial profiling is patently illegal, violating the U.S Constitution's core promises of equal protection under the law to all and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures”(ACLU 2016).
Equality in society is when all people are treated equally, but equality is no longer in society. “About 7 in 10 blacks and more than 1 in 4 whites concur that blacks are treated unequally by the criminal justice systems” (Roberts 2013).
In conclusion, racial profiling is unfair for the ones that fall in the categories for them to be depicted of committing a crime. Racial profiling should be made illegal throughout the United States because it creates lot of hostile acts, individual's rights are destroyed and certain races are not treated with equality. People, preferably blacks, should not be judged upon the color of their skin, but by the content of their