Arguments Against The 4th Amendment

Words: 380
Pages: 2

The 4th amendment is about privacy and protection from search and seizure, and when search and seizure is permitted. Even with the protections and restrictions that the 4th amendment puts on searches being reasonable and for a probable cause, the majority of search and seizures are performed on young people of color. even when they make up less of the population, proving a clear racial bias by police officers. The fourth amendment supports search and seizure under probable cause and affirmation, but the protections it gives against unjust search and seizures are rarely followed, and are frequently based on unfair profiling.
Stop and frisk is supported by the constitution as long as it's s under a probable cause. Probable cause is any reason that a person might
…show more content…
Since the majority of stop and frisks in brooklyn in 2012 were because of furtive movements, and the majority of people stopped and frisked were black, this shows that there is less reason going into searching black men and it takes very little for them to be suspected by the police. Even a slightly suspicious movement could get a black man stopped and frisked

In a video by the new york times, the person being interviewed said that he would be stopped 4-5 times a month, and not be told what he was being searched for or why they were searching him. This goes against the amendment’s statement that all searches must have a probable cause and affirmation of the probable cause. This also proves that the rules for search and search arnt full followed, and are often bent because of an officer's racial profile of a person.
The fourth amendment was made to protect against unjust search and seizures, but is frequently not followed fully when officers are so easily able to search based on racial profile. What needs to happen is a stronger enforcement of what probable cause and reasonable suspicion