Arguments Against Totalitarianism

Words: 1458
Pages: 6

The source argues that democracy is an incompetent and insufficient system, but is a positive alternative compared to the extreme systems found within total egalitarianism and elitism. The perspective suggests that democracy causes social and economic problems due to the clash between collectivist and individualist values within government. However, these complications are outweighed by the extremist forms of government that maintain an obsolete and narrow way of handling nation state affairs. These governments value the well-being of the country, rather than its citizens. Non-democratic governments control their country’s economic and social system by use of force and fear, while democratic states tend to have freedom as a major factor when …show more content…
The perspective has faith in human progress and tends to favour decentralized power, both in political and economic affairs. This opposes the ideals of dictatorship revolved countries that hold the belief that total unification in the country will help regimes make solid economics gains and that one party directing all affairs will create a clear and straight forward path for the future of the state. Totalitarian dictatorships would be against the concept of liberty and self-worth as they are based on the ideas of central planning and constraint of an individual through indoctrination. This contrasts to liberalisms four key principles known as personal and economic freedom, equality of right, limited government, and consent of the government. The discrepancies between democracy and dictatorships display the difference between personal freedom and individual restriction. I believe that the perspective of the source should be fully embraced as liberalism emphasizes on individual involvement within government to further improve the economic and social