Arguments Against Vaccination Research

Words: 1458
Pages: 6

Why vaccinate? This question has plagued generations ever since immunization became a reality. Society constantly questions as to how far medicine should be relied upon and trusted. On one side of the spectrum, people believe that humanity relies on medicine to much and that vaccination is an unhealthy, possibly dangerous addition to a person’s life. In contrast, others trust in the science of immunization to improve their health and believe in vaccination’s reliability. Which group is correct? Each person must examine the evidence for themselves to make an accurate, unbiased decision. Truth lies in the facts. Many take a strong stance against vaccination, saying that inoculations have dangerous side effects and are simply not worth the risk. Research has provided information suggesting that vaccines contain harmful …show more content…
The most prominent argument against immunization is found in their safety, but, if the facts are examined carefully one can understand that these statements rest on incorrect assumptions. The thorough Federal Drug Association testing process each drug has to withstand leaves very little chance for serious repercussions. In addition, inoculation remains vital to society because vaccines prevent the mass spread of disease through “herd immunity”, the majority of people in a community being immune. Not only does vaccination protect humanity at the current moment, but continued inoculation can and will build a safer, healthier future society. Current and past progress has made this prospect a reality, already showing signs of eliminating diseases that used to plague humankind. So, the question remains: why vaccinate? Vaccinate to protect more than just the individual in the here and now. Vaccinate to protect the