Aristotle-Nicomachean Moderation

Words: 1295
Pages: 6

Aristotle-Nicomachean Moderation

Taste, touch and temperance all are necessary for good health. Should be for physical, mind and ideological pleasures all are necessary, because it/they behavior cannot be either good or evil and self-control is a key to moderation. Taste, touch and Temperance are a part of temporary (moderation or self-restraint, especially in eating and drinking). “After Courage let us speak of temperance” It’s something that is only temporary. Temperance is geared toward governing our appetites for sensible pleasure, whether it’s food, alcohol, or sex. If man is the rational animal, then temperance is necessary for governing our animal natures. It ensures our will’s mastery over our base instincts. If we can’t moderate
…show more content…
It’s a way to show pleasure to one another, but also physical pleasure brings temporary happiness and is never really achieved or satisfied, for example. We have physical or bodily pleasures. This is sensible. Physical pleasures are an essential part of enjoying life, but at the same time we have to control it. We may share this pleasure with animals. Physical pleasure may be the key to happiness. In humans the scent or smell of food is why we eat, the enjoyment and the taste of the meal. Recall the last Thanksgiving meal, you wake up to the familiar smell of the turkey baking and you recall the taste of food with anticipation as to what is coming later for dinner. We have the love of food or drink. The physical pleasure brings temporary happiness. Take a bag of chips, we eat one, two, three then the bag is empty and we feel sick. This same analogy goes for t bottle of wine for instance. You drink one glass then two glasses then he bottle is gone and you are sick. This is a self-indulgent person. Don’t know when to stop. Usually we will not eat or drink something in the smells rotten. In the case of animals for example dogs and lions do not necessarily like the smell of the hunt but rather the meal they will eat. Not the appetite for the food but the thrill for the hunt. They enjoyment of the kill, but are they ever satisfied? When Aristotle talks about the lion lowing of the ox, he makes it sound like even though …show more content…
Aristotle makes it sound like its okay to be self-indulgent.
Food, drink, and sex are all necessary for our survival, individually and as a species; yet a disordered desire for any of these goods can have disastrous consequences, physical and moral. All are necessary, may be desires for pleasure that may be bad, but still act upon them. Self-control can mean they need to control themselves in the face of temptation, even when the outcome is bad. Responsibility
Out of control is self-indulgent, a vice or weak-willed and strong desires may lead us astray, and can increase their force in time; temperate person’s desires are moderate and few.
We learned that Aristotle the Greek Philosopher, scientist and studier of human knowledge. Known as “The man who knew everything” hit it spot on over 1600 years ago. As written like long ago food, drink and sex are themselves necessary, the pleasure they give us is universal, and everyone desires