Astrazeneca's Argument Essay

Words: 446
Pages: 2

People use ad hominem to attack one’s argument in an attempt to invalidate their opponent’s opinion. This approach is lazy, as the information used to combat the argument is irrelevant to the topic of discussion. The logical fallacy was consistently utilized among the press during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. As vaccines for the virus were being developed, pro-vax individuals had to decide which pharmaceutical company produced the most effective and safe vaccines. These companies made attempts to disprove the credibility of one another in marketing their own products. To divert the attention of vaccinators considering the vaccine of AstraZeneca, a British multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company, a journalist documented …show more content…
Despite the severity of the ideology, eugenics do not correlate to COVID-19 vaccines. For that reason, the journalist’s argument is flawed. To make a better argument, the journalist could have disregarded AstraZeneca’s vaccine by using evidence relevant to the production of their vaccine. Similar to ad hominem, loaded questions are logical fallacies used to tarnish one’s opinion or reputation to dismantle an opponent’s argument. Loaded questions are used to derail rational debates by compelling the recipient of the question to grow defensive or flustered. This is accomplished by the individual asking the question, implementing a presumption about the recipient into their question to make them feel guilty about their response. Once beloved R&B singer and songwriter R.Kelly became notorious for his history of sex trafficking, racketeering, and inappropriate child exploitation. In the late 2000s, before these accusations were proven as fact, R. Kelly was constantly interviewed, for his reputation was at stake. He tried to disregard the allegations, but the controversy over his appalling acts made it exceedingly difficult for