Atomic Bomb Justified Essay

Words: 688
Pages: 3

In the town of Hiroshima, Japan, after 44 months of of inquiringly brutal fighting in the Pacific, August 6, 1945, an American B-29 bomber appeared in the sky. It was loaded with a newly invented devastating weapon. Minutes later, that weapon- the Atomic Bomb- detonated the sky, killing some 70,000 Japanese civilians. Three days later, the U.S. dropped a second bomb over the city of Nagasaki, with similar results. The following week, Japan’s emperor announced to his city the decision to surrender, via radio. Though this brought World War II to its dramatic conclusion, there’s still ongoing debate wether or not the U.S. was justified in using the atomic bomb to end WWII. I believe that the United States was not justified.
This remains a very controversial topic in
…show more content…
The only thing that stood in the way of Japan and unconditional surrendering in the first place, was honor. America was not justified in dropping the bomb. They were not certain how strong the bomb was or how much damage it would cause, yet they decided to drop it on a city full of innocent children and people. Yes, there had to be an end to the war but there were different routes that could have been taken. Morally, dropping the bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a inhumane thing to do. Japan was warned that the bombing would happen, but they weren't given a date- not only that but what evidence did the U.S. have to give that proved they had such a weapon? The Japanese did plan on surrendering, it took so long because they wanted the emperor to stay in power. Though the emperor had no real power, and was just a figure, he didn’t pose a threat. America could not have just accepted the Japanese’s term of surrender, which was keeping the emperor in power. That was Japans only condition, yet the U.S. was dead set on their unconditional