Banned Book Argumentative Analysis

Words: 837
Pages: 4

Banned Book Argumentative Analysis

To begin, the purpose of Banned Book Week is to celebrate the freedom to read and express ideas. Banned Book Week is normally celebrated the last week of September. During this time the whole book community gathers to focuses are value to freely access information, and support our freedom into access information. The two books I am using in this essay are Speak and The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian. Furthermore, two books that should not be banned are Speak by Laurie Hasle Anderson and The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.

The book Speak by Laurie Hasle Anderson is about a girl named Melinda who lives in Syracuse, New York and is going into her Freshman year at Merryweather high.
…show more content…
“Junior” decides to switch school and go to Rearden an all white school which can be a pretty terrifying place when the only other Indian at the school is the mascot. “Junior” often feels he has made the wrong choice because of all the criticism he receives from both Rearden and at his reservation because of his choice. But then he tries out for the basketball team and makes varsity and everything changes at Rearden which only makes things worse at the reservation. In the end, “Junior” finally is in a good place and realizes he is not …show more content…
The book inspired many victims of sexual assault to speak out and receive the help they need like Melinda did in the book eventually. So why ban a book that helped women gain the help they needed? Speak also had many lessons like “IT happened. There is no avoiding it, no forgetting, no running away, or flying, or burying, or hiding” (197). This quote could help people understand that you can’t escape the horrible things happened to you but you can grow by knowing that you can’t avoid it. Another lesson in Speak