Barack Obama Speech On Race

Words: 686
Pages: 3

Everyone is an individual yet equal. This common thesis have been present through all of history, sometimes hiding in the shadow casted by large events, or sometimes it is the large events like the freedom summer of 1964. It is very hard to capture such a thought into words, however in Barack Obama’s Speech on Race and in Human Family, the authors are able to do it elegantly. A very large prevalent problem in the ideal of equality is racism. The thought that one race is superior to another (I.E nazi’s, KKK members, etc.) is tackled in both speeches. In Barack Obama’s Speech on Race, there are constant allusions to slavery and injustice to people of color, and that to form a more perfect union we must embrace these differences in color, leave …show more content…
One of them is, “In order to form a more perfect union” followed by or preceded by a point like equality. This is saying (in simplest terms) that we must all stand together to become stronger. Another quote that isn’t stated till the end but is implied heavily thuorought is, “The idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts- that out of many, we are truly one.” This could be interpreted in a few ways, however the way that is supposed to be obvious to the reader is that although there are many of us, all individual and unique, we are all equal and we must stand as one rather then being scattered and …show more content…
They both use repetition very heavily. In Barack Obama’s Speech on Race, the commonly repeated statement is, “to form a more perfect union.” Obama is very clear that through embracing everyone's individualism, equality will be achieved. Through that equality, the union can be perfected or get closer to perfect. In Human Family, the repeated statement is at the end of the poem, and it is, “We are more alike my friends, than unalike”. This is said often, but also earlier in the poem the author says, “I know ten thousand women called Jane and Mary Jane but I’ve not seen any two who really were the same”. This Relates back to the thesis, we are all individuals yet