Benjamin Banneker Letter Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 592
Pages: 3

In the excerpt from the letter, Benjamin Banneker was a son of former slaves that became so much more, “a farmer, astronomer, mathematician, surveyor, and author.” In the year of 1791, he challenged framer of the Declaration of Independence and secretary of state to President George Washington, Thomas Jefferson. Banneker uses a variety of rhetorical strategies to argue against slavery, being a son of slaves, as stated. Using rhetorical strategies, his use of language makes him come off intense and emotional about the topic in his letter. Banneker’s use of pathos allows him to get on a deeper and personal level with Thomas Jefferson. On lines 4 through 7 he states, “look back I entreat you on the variety of dangers to which you were exposed; …show more content…
The use of syntax creates an effect for his thought process. On lines 26 through 41 Banneker writes, “Here, sir, was a time in which your tender feelings for yourselves had engaged you thus to declare, you were then impressed with proper ideas of the great allow valuation of liberty and the free possession of those blessings to which you were entitled by nature; but, sir, how pitiable is it to reflect that although you were so fully convinced of the benevolence of the Father of mankind and of his equal and impartial distribution of those rights and privileges which he had conferred upon them, that you should at the same time counteract his mercies in detaining by fraud and violence so numerous a part of my brethren under groaning captivity and cruel oppression, that you should at the same time be found guilty of that most criminal act which you professedly detested in others with respect to yourselves.”(26-41) The long flowy sentence allows the reader to really understand and follow what Banneker is feeling. Benjamin Banneker, a man with less authority than framer of the Declaration of Independence and secretary of state to President George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, questioned Jefferson. Getting Banneker’s point across was done in a way that was both logical and emotional. He also was able to use some written evidence to support his argument, along with allusion, syntax, and other rhetorical