Birthright Citizenship In America

Words: 973
Pages: 4
Open Document
Lately, there has been many changes due to our new president, Donald Trump. One of the main changes is about birthright citizenship. So many life’s have already been changing because of him recently; for building the wall on the Mexican American border. Many people fear that he will be targeting how he will handle the immigration and change what it means to be an American. Even though we have our fourteen amendment which is, anyone that’s born in the United States and subject to jurisdiction are considered citizens of the United States. Immigration had always been a source of controversy in the United States, it has been going on even before the nation’s founding. In “An Argument to Be Made about Immigrant Babies and Citizenship,” George Will …show more content…
“The fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution,” she states, “grants automatic citizenship to anyone born on American soil, including the children of undocumented immigrants.” Chaves argues at the time of the adoption of the amendment, there was no category of illegal immigrants because immigration was unrestricted and unregulated. “More importantly,” she says, “ending birthright citizenship would fundamentally change what it means to be an American.” She adds how mostly ever country still uses “jus sanguine” or “right of blood” which she explains, it is an individual gain citizenship by having an ancestor who is national or citizen of the state. The biggest and most serious challenge to birthright citizenship was for the Chinese illegal immigrants in 1898. Chinese came to America for a better living and jobs. She explains that the workers and employees would dislike the Chinese. It became popular that they were resenting them, that it led to America’s first immigration restricted law. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The Chinese couldn’t own a property, marry, or return to the U.S. if they left, or to become American citizens. She continues explaining that our history has been growing very largely from all races and ethnicities. Since the abolition of slavery, there hasn’t been a child denied citizenship if they were born in the U.S. So, conservatives should not betray or stop these values based on …show more content…
Birthright citizenship should keep on continuing, it has been going on for many years now and it hasn’t done anything wrong to the United States. “Birthright citizenship is important,” says Brian Schoeneman, “because it is one of the most fundamental of our rights. It ensures the protection of other liberties by promising that those born here are given equal treatment, access to the courts and protection under the law.” Everyone deserves to be under that protection. Stopping this can cause terrible things around the U.S. It would be critical and betray many people. It won’t be fair to the people that are being denied, when we have already in the past few years, let children become citizens even if their mother were illegal. As in experience, my aunt who lives in Mexico and had her babies in America. Told me why she did that and the reason was, because they have better education and the welfare benefits. Also, another main reason is because Mexico is in a very bad stage with gangs and other serious stuff, so mostly people from there come to America to get their children away from that. Most of the reason why people do it are good reasons. We all have equal rights means equal opportunity to all citizens of the U.S. and truthfully that should be upheld with every new member of this country. Where your parents originate from and your nationalities that extend far into ancestry have no effect
Show More

Related Documents: Birthright Citizenship In America

Birthright Citizenship Debate

The birthright citizenship is a controversial topic that has caused a debate between the people who are in favor of it and those who do not. According to the author Linda Chavez in her essay called “The Case for Birthright Citizenship,” if birthright citizenship ends, it would change what it means to be an American. Likewise, the author and professor of law Ediberto Roman, in his article “The Proposal to Eliminate Birthright Citizenship Is Long on Attacks, Short on Legality,” says that legally eliminating…

Words 662 - Pages 3

Birthright Citizenship

practice Jus Soli, which means that is a right to give the citizenship or nationality of the country and state to those new born. But, the dysfunction of the current US Immigration System has resulted millions of illegal or unauthorized immigrants in the country. Many people suggested to solve the problem of illegal immigration by reinterpreting or changing the fourteenth amendment to the US constitution to eliminate birthright citizenship. However, those who suggest such change encourage those illegal…

Words 689 - Pages 3

Birthright Citizenship Definition

Birthright Citizenship is a common practice in the U.S. that allows children who were born on the territory of the United States automatically become citizens, regardless of their parents’ legal status at the time. In 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment that states “All person born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” made the birthright citizenship a part of the Constitution. This practice…

Words 1058 - Pages 5

Birthright Citizenship Research Paper

During his presidential campaign, President Donald J. Trump has called for a reform in birthright citizenship, one that excludes children of illegal immigrants. US birthright citizenship, granted in the 14th Amendment, guaranteed that any child born on American soil is automatically, regardless of his or her parentage, a US citizen. Congress initially passed the amendment after the Civil War in 1868 to ensure children of African American slaves were US citizens. However, as more women flock to the…

Words 722 - Pages 3

Birthright Citizenship Should Be Abolished Essay

of living in America seems appealing to many; it provides countless opportunities, experiences, and freedom. As a result, many illegal immigrants now reside here, and some families give birth on U.S. soil to make the deportation process far more difficult. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has recently proposed an immigration plan where anyone in the United States will not automatically become a U.S. citizen at birth. So now the question arises, should birthright citizenship become abolished…

Words 700 - Pages 3

Revealing Birthright Citizenship Rhetorical Analysis

pg. 596, line 3 - “Repealing birthright citizenship is a terrible idea. It will unquestionably jeopardize the electoral future of the gop by alienating Hispanics-the largest minority and fastest-growing segment of the U.S Population. More importantly, ending birthright citizenship would fundamentally change what it means to be an American.” I think Chavez knows that her audience is white businessmen, who already dislike immigrants, plus she already stated people dislike immigrants. Politicians use…

Words 513 - Pages 3

the basis of imagination Essay

Krikorian states, “Any new amnesty, even if only for those brought here as children, will attract further illegal immigration” (506). Illegal immigrants will keep crossing the border as long as there is a possibility that their predecessors can achieve citizenship. If there is no form of severe punishment, then there will never be a reason for prospective illegal immigrants to think twice about crossing the border. The DREAM Act also rewards illegal immigrants. It rewards both the kids brought to the United…

Words 1148 - Pages 5

Argumentative Essay: Who Is An American?

some people believe that being born in the U.S, serving in the U.S. military make one an American automatically but Japanese Americans were interned and had their citizenship removed even when they were born and raised in America. The U.S. military risks their lives for the U.S. but not all of them are gaining citizenship, some are…

Words 881 - Pages 4

Differences Between Roosevelt And Japanese Internment

Executive Order denied the citizenship of an entire group of people. Japanese-Americans were denied due process, which is guaranteed by the 5th and 14 amendments. The evacuation of the Nisei was also motivated by racial prejudice. Retrospectively, the destitute reparations and limited evidence all show that President Roosevelt was not justified in ordering the Executive Order that lead to Japanese internment. The United States upheld the government’s right to deny U.S citizenship to already Japanese-Americans…

Words 577 - Pages 3

Essay on The Problem with Immigration to the United States

citizen and don't know what to do. But also, there is another issues to propose new legislation pertaining to the naturalization process such as Dream Act benefits, and Birthright citizenship. When we think about the US we think about immigration, both the legal and the illegal immigration. The United States of America is a country buildup around immigration. Immigration has been responsible for religious changes, cultural change and population growth throughout the history of…

Words 872 - Pages 4