Brene Brown once said, “Guilt is just as powerful, but its influence is positive, while shame’s is destructive. Shame erodes our courage and fuels disengagement.” A boy was accused of the murder of his father everyone suspects that he is guilty right away and not looking over the evidence, this kid has had a rough life and had never gotten anything fair so he deserves a fair trial. When you do look evidence the defendant is not guilty because the boy’s downstairs neighbor is physically impaired, also there were many copies of the murder weapon, and the neighbor across the way vision was impaired when she saw the killing. One way that you know that the defendant is not guilty is because the neighbor downstairs was physically impaired. How you know the evidence is not accurate because when the witness said it took him 15 seconds to get to the door to see the boy from his bedroom. You could see that this man has an injured left leg so he couldn’t have walked to the door in 15 seconds because in a test to see how long it would have taken him to get up from his bed to go the entry of his household and it was around 45 seconds. This older man couldn’t have been able to get to the door in 15 seconds because a younger aged…show more content… Across the way in an apartment two stories high, through a L-train, saw the defendant kill his father. This evidence clarifies that the defendant was the person who killed his father because there was an eyewitness. Even though the eyewitness saw the killing she was not wearing her eye glasses at night because most people don’t wear their glasses at night. How you know she wore glasses is because she two indents on the side of her nose where her eye glasses would be. This is sufficient evidence to show that she is not a reliable witness to examine. There was an eyewitness across the way who saw the killing happen but she was not wearing her glasses at the time of the
