Brutus Caesar Funeral Speech Analysis

Words: 666
Pages: 3
Open Document
As one presidential candidate was clearly king of the hill at the debate, the other sweated profusely; in fact, viewers could see perspiration leak through his shirt while hearing labored breaths loud and clear while the other candidate spoke. Without rhetoric, there wouldn't be much possibility for how real men fight -with words- not to mention traditions that have existed in the art of arguing for centuries. Among the earliest examples is the bout of Brutus and Mark Antony shortly after Caesar's death. The funeral speech turned heated debate had many similarities and discrepancies alike. Indeed, the two men utilized every minute tool on their belts because both them and the reader knew that their lives were on the table.

While having different agendas and goals, it cannot be helped that the two men's arguments had, at the very least, some correspondences. The reader needn't think too hard to come up with the first similarity, which is their goal. Caesar was very close to both contenders, and they wanted to say …show more content…
Brutus' fate was sealed along with his petty rhetoric after they were driven out of Rome. Ultimately, the resolution of the play was in fact partially determined by the outcome of the speeches. Hypothetically, if the speeches were absent from the play then Brutus and Cassius may have been able to survive, and the outcome may have been unalike with the current one. One thing that is constant and couldn't change much is the fact that Brutus is a tragic hero.

Hence, rhetoric is a very powerful tool that can turn literal armies against one another. It has the ability to kill without losing credibility. It is the weapon of gods, much more capable than mere direct violence as shown in the outcomes of "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar". Becoming adept at reasoning with others has not been so important as not, not only to attack, but defending oneself from jabs at one's
Show More

Related Documents: Brutus Caesar Funeral Speech Analysis

Brutus Caesar Research Paper

Brutus is a betrayer because he didn't want Caesar's best interest at heart, he showed hatred, and he wanted power by any means. Although, Brutus made the people believe he did this as a good deed, this was a brutal act. Brutus would've been a noble King, however a person who makes decisions without being King is dangerous. To begin with Brutus killed Caesar to protect Rome, but it was a brutal killing. Brutus did not want the people to become slaves. Brutus states “The only way is to kill Caesar…

Words 609 - Pages 3

Julius Caesar Kill Them With Kindness Analysis

Kill Them with Kindness (An analysis of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar) The world we live in today is filled with violence. Whether it be through the news, books, video games, or movies, society is constantly being bombarded with violence and war. Growing up, children learn at an early age that violence can solve any problem. Violence is never the answer. People who act out in violence ruin their own lives, and others' lives as well. People die for no reason every day from unstable men, women…

Words 991 - Pages 4