Burwell V. Hobby Lobby Case

Words: 1466
Pages: 6

Obama’s contraception mandate is the mandate in which health plans must fully cover any form of contraception and tries to establish a universal convention when it comes to the practice of medicine. But not everyone could accept this mandate especially people from religious society because it is something against their religion. However, for some kind of particular health services and screening which is including birth control, under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are all covered in the new insurance plans without deductible or cost sharing. Studies also show that many women are using birth control in order to control the fertilization or to delay the pregnancy.

Background Basically, Hobby Lobby case is two cases heard together which is between Burwell v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood v. Burwell. Burwell is the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). When people want to sue the government for the constitutional rights, they typically name a specific official who heads the government agency or department that is doing the violation. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc owned and operates by Green family
…show more content…
This ruling on Burwell v. Hobby Lobby will have an impact in our life or maybe there will be another similar lawsuit case in the present and future. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Case’s ruling is based on the law, Freedom Restoration Act of 1933(RFRA) and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. The company can be interpreted as a person and it can have the same right of freedom of religion under the First Amendment. I am still not sure about the meaning of closely-held-for-profit company. Is it has something to do with the average size of company, profit or non-profit company? However, in this case we need to take a good look of how the religious belief at the work place affected the employee’s rights especially in a certain benefits that they could get from their