Cartesian Dualism

Words: 687
Pages: 3

Flaws of Cartesian Dualism and Materialism

Dualism or duality is the position that thoughts and knowing are, in some respects, non physical, or that the mind and body are not identical. This means it encompasses a set of views about the relationship between mind and matter, and between subject and object. Dualism is contrasted with other aspects, such as physicalism. In the mind–body problem. For however, another philosopher believed the soul was not dependent on the physical body so instead he believed in a process called metempsychosis, the migration of the soul to a new physical body (Bruer 3). This can also be referred to as reincarnation, but reincarnation is closely related with religions. Dualism is usually a topic that is associated
…show more content…
Materialism is closely related to the belief that everything physical is all that can be known. Thus the term "physicalism" is preferred over "materialism" by some, while others use the terms as if they are the same term. Philosophies contradictory to materialism or physicalism include idealism, pluralism, dualism, and other forms of monism (Wiki). Materialism belongs to the class of monist ontology. It is different from ontological theories based on dualism. For singular explanations of the phenomenal reality, materialism would be in contrast to idealism, neutral monism, and spiritualism. Despite the large number of philosophical schools and subtle nuances between many, all philosophies are said to fall into one of two primary categories, which are defined in contrast to each other: materialism. The basic proposition of these two categories pertains to the nature of reality, and the primary distinction between them is the way they answer two fundamental questions: "what does reality consist of?" and "how does it originate?" To idealists, spirit or mind or the objects of mind are primary, and matter secondary. To materialists, matter is primary, and mind or spirit or ideas are secondary, the product of matter acting upon …show more content…
Examples of qualia include the pain of a migraine, the taste of any drink, and the perceived redness of an evening sky. As qualitative characters of sensation, qualia stand in contrast to "propositional attitudes". Various philosophers emphasize or deny the existence of certain features of qualia. The nature and existence of various definitions of qualia remain controversial. There are many definitions of qualia, which have changed over time. One of the simpler, broader definitions is: "The 'what it is like' character of mental states. The way it feels to have mental states such as pain, seeing red, smelling a rose,